Comparison and Optimization of Machine Learning Methods for Fault Detection in District Heating and Cooling Systems

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2025

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Polska Akad Nauk, Polish Acad Sci, Div Iv Technical Sciences Pas

Open Access Color

GOLD

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Average
Popularity
Average

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

In this study, the methods used for the detection of sub-station pollution failures in district heating and cooling (DHC) systems are analyzed. In the study, high, medium, and low-level pollution situations are considered and machine learning methods are applied for the detection of these failures. Random forest, decision tree, logistic regression, and CatBoost regression algorithms are compared within the scope of the analysis. The models are trained to perform fault detection at different pollution levels. To improve the model performance, hyper parameter optimization was performed with random search optimization, and the most appropriate values were selected. The results show that the CatBoost regression algorithm provides the highest accuracy and overall performance compared to other methods. The CatBoost model stood out with an accuracy of 0.9832 and a superior performance. These findings reveal that CatBoost-based approaches provide an effective solution in situations requiring high accuracy, such as contamination detection in DHC systems. The study makes an important contribution as a reliable fault detection solution in industrial applications.

Description

Aslan, Emrah/0000-0002-0181-3658;

Keywords

Pollution Detection, Grid Search Optimization, Machine Learning, DHC

Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL

Fields of Science

Citation

WoS Q

Q3

Scopus Q

Q3
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A

Source

Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences-Technical Sciences

Volume

73

Issue

3

Start Page

154063

End Page

154063
PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 1

Scopus : 2

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 5

SCOPUS™ Citations

2

checked on Feb 01, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

2

checked on Feb 01, 2026

Page Views

2

checked on Feb 01, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
0.0

Sustainable Development Goals