Aslan Çelik, BurçakOğuz, Mehmet CemalOğuz, Mehmet Cemal21.02. Department of Medical Services and Techniques / Tıbbi Hizmetler ve Teknikleri Bölümü21. Vocational School of Health Services / Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulu01. Mardin Artuklu University / Mardin Artuklu Üniversitesi2022-01-042022-01-042021ASLAN ÇELİK, B., & OĞUZ, M. C. (2021). Investigations of the endohelminths of some fish from Murat river in Ağrı and Aras river in Erzurum in TURKEY. In Marine Science and Technology Bulletin. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.33714/masteb.835508https://doi.org/10.33714/masteb.835508https://app.trdizin.gov.tr/makale/TkRNd05URTBOQT09/investigations-on-endohelmint-fauna-of-teleost-fishes-of-aras-and-murat-rivers-in-turkeyhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12514/2955In this study which has been done between April 2008 and June 2009, fishes captured from Ağrı and Erzurum were examined by endoparasite fauna. Examined fishes are as follows: Acanthobrama marmid Heckel, 1843, Alburnus akili Battalgil, 1942, Barbus plebejus Bonaparte, 1839, Barbus mursa Güldenstädt, 1773, Capoeta barroisi Lortet in Barrois, 1894, Capoeta capoeta Güldenstädt, 1773, Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758, Leuciscus cephalus Linnaeus, 1758. Consequently, a total of 908 individual parasites were detected from six parasite species; Rhabdochona denudata Dujardin, 1845 (Nematoda), Neoechinorhynchus sp. and Pomphorhynchus sp. (Acanthocephala), Bothriocephalus acheilognathi Yamaguti, 1934, and Caryophyllaeus laticeps Pallas, 1781 (Cestoda), Allocreadium isoporum Looss, 1894 (Digenea). The distribution of the infection prevalence, mean intensity, and abundance values of parasite species were determined. As a result of our study, 93 of 233 (39.91%) fish were reported with parasites.en10.33714/masteb.835508info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEndohelminth, Parasite fauna ,Aras River, Murat RiverArticle