Okur, M.H.Aydoğdu, B.Azizoğlu, M.Arslan, S.Bayram, S.basuguy, E.2025-02-152025-02-1520240022-3468https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.11.015https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12514/6274Objective: Our goal was to compare single-incision laparoscopic percutaneous and cystoscope forceps-assisted Morgagni hernia repair techniques. Materials and methods: A total of 40 patients were allocated to two groups, each with 20 patients. Group 1: Single incision (port) laparoscopic surgical percutaneous Morgagni hernia repair (with a 5 mm Storz laparoscopic scope entered through the umbilicus). Group 2: Single incision (port) laparoscopic surgical percutaneous Morgagni hernia repair (with an 11 Fr [3.6 mm] cystoscope entered through the umbilicus + using forceps + sac plication, and sac cauterization). In Group 1; the sac was not removed. In group 2; we advanced the forceps through the cystoscope, caught the sac, pushed the needle through the sac, plicated the sac, and then cauterized the sac with Bugbee electrode. Results: Of the 40 patients, 70 % (n = 28) were male. The symptoms at admission included repeated chest infections (40 %), dyspnea (30 %), vomiting (22 %), and abdominal pain (22 %). No difference was found between groups in terms of age, gender symptomatology, or associated anomalies. The operation time was shorter in group 2 compared to group 1 (p < 0.05; 25 min vs 40 min). Although there was one recurrence in Group 1, no recurrence was reported in Group 2. The recurrence incidence did not differ between groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Cystoscope-assisted repair of Morgagni hernia was found to be superior in terms of safety and shorter operation time. Level of evidence: Type III. Type of the study: Retrospective study. © 2023 Elsevier Inc.en10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.11.015info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessMinimal Invasive SurgeryMorgagni HerniaPercutaneous RepairArticle59610891093Q2Q12-s2.0-85182366940382205551