MAÜ GCRIS Standart veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.

Bilgisayar Programcılığı Bölümü

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12514/187

Browse

Browsing Bilgisayar Programcılığı Bölümü by Language "en"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Conference Object
    A REVIEW OF MULTI OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION
    (2016) Hüseyin Ahmetoğlu
    Merging systems, enhancing inter-disciplinary relations and increasing needs require multi objectives rather than a single objective in the optimization problems nowadays. However, the objectives are frequently conflicting. When an objective is improved, the other objective(s) may deteriorate. In the multi-objective optimization problems (MOOPs), the aim is to come up with the best solutions that can be an alternative for each other in terms of objective function values under the constraints caused by various reasons. During the last two decades, MOOPs and solution methods have been studied with great interest. It is possible to come across a MOOP in almost every discipline in the literature. MOOPs have been modelled and solved not only in the fields with more applications such as production, management, business administration, marketing, transportation and finance but also in the basic sciences such as chemistry, maths and statistics. Solution of MOOPs requires the simultaneous optimization of conflicting multi objectives. In MOOPs, an optimal solution set on which a compromise is reached among the conflicting objectives is obtained. In this study, the articles on multi-objective optimization written in 2015 and later are analysed and 61 articles are chosen among them. Classical and heuristic methods implemented for the solution of MOOPs presented in these articles are mentioned. The articles are classified according to their subject areas. The methodology used in each article is identified. According to their implementation areas, the multi-objective optimization methods and the areas they are implemented the most are discussed. The areas to be focused on in the future studies to obtain more robust results in the optimization are identified.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Review of the Opinions of Vocational High School Teachers, Students, and Administrators on the Interactive Whiteboard1
    (Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 2020) Aykat, Şükrü; Günüç, Selim; Aykat, Şükrü
    The primary aim of this study is to determine whether there was a difference in teachers' levels of interactive whiteboard usage, their self-efficacy, and opinions before and after the Use of Technology in Education Course (UTEC) in vocational high schools where FATIH project was implemented. Research participants constituted of teachers and school administrators, and students attending Telkari Vocational and Technical Anatolian High School in which interactive whiteboard installation was made within the framework of FATIH project in Midyat district of Mardin province and who attended UTEC training in the 2015-2016 academic year. In this study, a mixed research method model was used. Data were collected through scale, survey and semi-structured interview forms. Quantitative data were analyzed by mean and ttest, and qualitative data were analyzed by content analysis. In conclusion of the study, it was observed that there was no significant change in the self-efficacy of teachers using interactive whiteboard and their level of using interactive whiteboard after UTEC training. Furthermore, it was observed that teachers were unable to develop materials for the interactive whiteboard before UTEC training, and after the UTEC training, they were able to prepare materials in part. This fact has revealed that the UTEC training content was not sufficient in material development for the interactive whiteboard. The students, on the other hand, indicated that they preferred the courses used on the interactive whiteboard and asked the teachers to continue using the interactive whiteboard. Participant students indicated that interactive whiteboard failures also adversely affected the lesson. Teachers, students, and school administrators reported that use an interactive whiteboard in the course increased student success and positively affected interest and participation in the course.