Temel İslam Bilimleri Bölümü

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12514/50

Browse

Browsing Temel İslam Bilimleri Bölümü by Journal "Cumhuriyet İlahiyat Dergisi"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    The Issue of the Halku’l-Qur’an in the Eyes of Zahiri Scholars
    (Cumhuriyet Univ, Fac theology, 2023) Kaya, Husamettin
    The Islamic thought has experienced many ruptures in history. One of them is the Mihna period. The main argument of the mihna period, which started during the reign of the Abbasid Khalifa Me'mun, was the issue of the khalq al-Qur'an. The leading figures of the period were dictated to accept the idea that the Qur'an was created. Those who took an opposing stance were oppressed , tortured. In this period, people like Ahmed b. Hanbal, who did not bow to oppresion, were made heroic by the people. This time, the reverse Mihna period started and those who spoke about the people of the Qur'an were criticized. Many of the muhaddith considered the approach to the issue of the khalq al-Qur'an as a bid'ah. This situation has created a field of criticism for people and segments who do not like each other. For this reason, unfair perceptions have been created about some people and their authorities in the society have been targeted with unfounded claims. Therefore, it is important to consider the approaches of Islamic scholars or sects to the subject objectively and to evaluate them in this context. In this study, the approaches of Dawud az-Zahiri (d. 270/884), the founder of the Zahiri sect, who were negatively affected by the situation in question , other Zahiri scholars to 'khalq al-Qur'an' were examined. In addition to the perception made about them, it is aimed to determine the accuracy of the discourses attributed to them. In this context, first of all, the views attributed to them are (i) The Qur'an in our hands, which consists of paper and ink, is not created, whereas the Qur'an in the preserved tablet is not created. (ii) The Qur'an is muhdes (created). (iii) The Qur'an is muhdes, and it is a creature in terms of its pronunciation. (iv) When the Qur'an is recited, the pronunciation that occurs as a result of the movements made by the servant to extract the letters has been classified as creature. These discourses attributed to them were compared with the information found in the works of Zahiri scholars and it was determined whether they were consistent or not. As a result of the researches, Dawud az-Zahiri, who was in Nishapur during the years when the mihna process continued, expressed some discourses about the creation of the Qur'an; however, with the end of the mihna, it was concluded that he gave up his discourses in question. Ibn Abi Asim (d. 287/900), Ibn Niftawayh (d. 323/935), Ibn Hazm (d. 456/1064), and Ibn al-Kaysarani (d. 507/1113), who are among the apparent scholars, have openly stated that the Qur'an is not a creature and they also blaspheme those who claim otherwise. In addition, it has been observed that the perception made independently of the correctness or falsity of the discourses attributed to them negatively affects the Zahiri scholars in many ways. For example, it is because of this that Zahiri scholars who are exposed to such perceptions lose value both in the eyes of the public and in the scientific assemblies.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Citation - WoS: 3
    Citation - Scopus: 3
    Kavramsal Metafor Kuramı’nın Kur’ân Çalışmalarına Dahil Edilmesi: Eleştirel Literatür Değerlendirmesi
    (Cumhuriyet İlahiyat Dergisi, 2022) Yaşar, Hakime Reyyan; 05.01. Department of Basic Islamic Sciences / Temel İslam Bilimleri Bölümü; 05. Faculty of Islamic Sciences / İslami İlimleri Fakültesi; 01. Mardin Artuklu University / Mardin Artuklu Üniversitesi
    Kavramsal metafor kuramı, son yıllarda kognitif dilbiliminin metafor sahasına kazandırdığı iddialı teoriler-den biridir. Kuramın temel iddiası metaforların kelimeden ziyade kavramlar/tasavvur düzeyinde meydana geldiğidir. Burada tür-cins, nakil ve benzerlik ilişkisini bir kenara bırakılarak metaforların kelimelere değil tecrübeye dayalı tasavvura ait olduğu ortaya konulmuştur. Bu kuram, son yıllarda Kur’ân çalışmalarıyla ilgi-lenen pek çok araştırmacıların da dikkatini çekmiştir. Bunun neticesinde Kur’ân’daki mecâzları ve metafor-ları bu kuram penceresinden inceleyen bir literatür ortaya çıkmıştır. Ancak, kavramsal metafor kuramı, me-tafor çözümlemesini gündelik beşerî dil üzerinde gerçekleştirir. Bu nedenle kuramın kutsal metinlerde yer alan metaforların tahliline yönelik bir yaklaşımı bulunmamaktadır. Buna ek olarak, belagâtta mecâz lafız ve mana ilişkisi üzerinden açıklanırken, bu kuram metaforu tecrübeye dayalı düşünce ve dil ilişkisi üzerinde temellendirir. Bu farklılıklara rağmen, Kur’ân ayetlerini bu kuramla ele alan çalışmaların sayısı gün geçtik-çe artmaktadır. Kuramı, Kur’ân’ı yorumlama aracı olarak tatbik eden araştırmaların ayetleri tefsir usulü ve belagâtın desteğinin uzağında inceledikleri ve metaforların vahyin bir parçası olduğunu dikkate almadıkları tespit edilmiştir. Bu çalışma bahsi geçen literatürü, literatürün takip ettiği metodu, kuramı nasıl tatbik ettik-lerini, Kur’ân çalışmalarına katkılarını ve temel eksikliklerini değerlendirmektedir. Bu bağlamda, çalışma-mız kuramın alana katkısını ve eksikliklerini sorgulamaktadır.