Mimarlık ve Şehir Planlama Bölümü Koleksiyonu
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12514/170
Browse
Browsing Mimarlık ve Şehir Planlama Bölümü Koleksiyonu by WoS Q "Q3"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Article Citation - WoS: 3Citation - Scopus: 3Investigating the limestone quarries as geoheritage sites: Case of Mardin ancient quarry(De Gruyter, 2023) Karataş, Lale; Alptekin, Aydın; Yakar, MuratAbstract: Abandoned quarries are valuable as a tourism element, as they exhibit the building material of the buildings built in the geographical area they are located in as historical objects. However, in order to determine how the quarries can be used for tourism purposes, it is necessary to determine the constraints on the choice of solution in spatial arrangements. The aim of this study is to investigate how the ancient limestone quarry of Mardin, which is a natural and cultural geological heritage, can be used for tourism and to develop suggestions. Within the scope of the study, in order to examine the possibilities of how an idle quarry located in Mardin province in Turkey can be used for tourism, the constraints in the selection of the post-use solution will be determined. In order to determine whether the Mardin quarry is accessible and safe to visit, various field studies were carried out in the study area, laboratory experiments and analyses. The caves were scanned with a 3D laser scanner, and its plans and sections were obtained. The findings were evaluated and suggestions were developed for the use of the ancient limestone quarry for tourism.Article Citation - WoS: 1Citation - Scopus: 1The Karapapaks and their shifting loyalties on the imperial borderlands during the nineteenth century(Taylor & Francis Online, 2022) Çiftçi, ErdalThe Karapapaks were one of the less known native Turkish ethnic groups of the Transcaucasia, who overwhelmingly took refuge in the Ottoman and Qajar Empires in the late 1820s, after the expansion of Tsarist Russia into their homelands. This paper analyses how the literature regarding Karapapak movements and society was overwhelmingly shaped by selective, essentialist, and anachronistic approaches by some historians in Turkey and Iran. While the former determined that they were a loyal pro-Ottoman and pro-Sunni Karapapak society, the latter constructed an opposing pro-Iranian and pro-Shiite narrative. This paper deconstructs both approaches, and asserts that the collective ethnic and sectarian identities of this society played a secondary role in regards to influencing their cross-border movements. This paper argues that the approach of the current literature cannot explain this borderland society’s perpetual, multiple and multi-directional cross-border movement. Instead, the Karapapaks often manoeuvred the frontiers of the empires, and defected to another empire when it was necessary to, first and foremost, satisfy the needs of their own society, over those of any imperial allies.Article Citation - WoS: 1Negotiating empire in the Middle East: Ottomans and Arab Nomads in the modern era, 1840- 1914(Taylor & Francis Online, 2021) Çiftçi, ErdalHistorians of the Ottoman Empire have overwhelmingly undermined the roles that tribes played and marginalized them without having sufficient focus on their activities in their studies. The current literature approaches the nomads of the empire as absolute losers of the modernizing period of the Tanzimat and later periods.