MAÜ GCRIS Standart veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Soıleau, Mark Lewıs

Loading...
Profile Picture
Name Variants
Soileau, Mark
Job Title
Doç. Dr.
Email Address
Main Affiliation
Department of Anthropology / Antropoloji Bölümü
Status
Former Staff
Website
ORCID ID
Scopus Author ID
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
Google Scholar ID
WoS Researcher ID

Sustainable Development Goals Report Points

SDG data could not be loaded because of an error. Please refresh the page or try again later.
Scholarly Output

3

Articles

1

Citation Count

0

Supervised Theses

0

Scholarly Output Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Book Review
    Citation - WoS: 0
    The Plain of Saints and Prophets: The Nusayri-Alawi Community of Cilicia (Southern Turkey) and its Sacred Places
    (Cambridge University Press, 2011) Soıleau, Mark Lewıs; Department of Anthropology / Antropoloji Bölümü
    Gisela Procházka-Eisl and Stephan Procházka. The Plain of Saints and Prophets: The Nusayri-Alawi Community of Cilicia (Southern Turkey) and its Sacred Places. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2010. 404 pages, 61 color pictures. Cloth €68 ISBN 978–3-447–06178-0.
  • Book Review
    Citation - WoS: 0
    Sharing sacred spaces in the Mediterranean: Christians, Muslims and Jews at shrines and sanctuaries
    (WILEY-BLACKWELL, 2014) Soıleau, Mark Lewıs; Department of Anthropology / Antropoloji Bölümü
  • Article
    Citation - WoS: 9
    Conforming Haji Bektash: A Saint and His Followers between Orthopraxy and Heteropraxy
    (BRILL ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS, 2014) Soıleau, Mark Lewıs; Department of Anthropology / Antropoloji Bölümü
    Since his death in the 13th century, the Anatolian Sufi saint Haji Bektash Veli has been the subject of a debate as to whether he conformed to the sharia, different parties having at different times portrayed him as either an antinomian charismatic mystic or a sharia-abiding Sufi scholar. This paper traces the course of the debate from the 14th century until today, situating the various interpretations in their historical contexts. As will be seen, interpretations of Haji Bektash's character are often influenced by that of his followers, the Bektashis, who have come to be known as antinomian. Because this non-conformity poses a problem for sharia-minded commentators, the debate is usually framed in terms that can be summarized as a dichotomy between orthopraxy and heteropraxy. Responding to this, Bektashis have instead reframed the dichotomy as one between what we can call esopraxy and exopraxy. The debate is still active today, showing that the concern for this 13th-century saint's praxis is still relevant in modern Turkey.