Soıleau, Mark Lewıs

Loading...
Profile Picture
Name Variants
Soileau, Mark
Job Title
Doç. Dr.
Email Address
Main Affiliation
Department of Anthropology / Antropoloji Bölümü
Status
Former Staff
Website
ORCID ID
Scopus Author ID
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
Google Scholar ID
WoS Researcher ID

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data is not available
This researcher does not have a Scopus ID.
This researcher does not have a WoS ID.
Scholarly Output

3

Articles

1

Views / Downloads

57/81

Supervised MSc Theses

0

Supervised PhD Theses

0

WoS Citation Count

9

Scopus Citation Count

0

WoS h-index

1

Scopus h-index

0

Patents

0

Projects

1

WoS Citations per Publication

3.00

Scopus Citations per Publication

0.00

Open Access Source

0

Supervised Theses

0

Google Analytics Visitor Traffic

JournalCount
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ANTHROPOLOGICAL INSTITUTE1
Review of Middle East Studies1
WELT DES ISLAMS1
Current Page: 1 / 1

Scopus Quartile Distribution

Competency Cloud

GCRIS Competency Cloud

Scholarly Output Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Book Review
    The Plain of Saints and Prophets: The Nusayri-Alawi Community of Cilicia (Southern Turkey) and its Sacred Places
    (Cambridge University Press, 2011) Soileau, Mark
    Gisela Procházka-Eisl and Stephan Procházka. The Plain of Saints and Prophets: The Nusayri-Alawi Community of Cilicia (Southern Turkey) and its Sacred Places. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2010. 404 pages, 61 color pictures. Cloth €68 ISBN 978–3-447–06178-0.
  • Article
    Citation - WoS: 9
    Conforming Haji Bektash: A Saint and His Followers between Orthopraxy and Heteropraxy
    (BRILL ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS, 2014) Soileau, Mark
    Since his death in the 13th century, the Anatolian Sufi saint Haji Bektash Veli has been the subject of a debate as to whether he conformed to the sharia, different parties having at different times portrayed him as either an antinomian charismatic mystic or a sharia-abiding Sufi scholar. This paper traces the course of the debate from the 14th century until today, situating the various interpretations in their historical contexts. As will be seen, interpretations of Haji Bektash's character are often influenced by that of his followers, the Bektashis, who have come to be known as antinomian. Because this non-conformity poses a problem for sharia-minded commentators, the debate is usually framed in terms that can be summarized as a dichotomy between orthopraxy and heteropraxy. Responding to this, Bektashis have instead reframed the dichotomy as one between what we can call esopraxy and exopraxy. The debate is still active today, showing that the concern for this 13th-century saint's praxis is still relevant in modern Turkey.