MAÜ GCRIS Standart veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

The Stability of Some Spring Triticale Genotypes Using Biplot Analysis

dc.authorscopusid36640094400
dc.authorscopusid56016491100
dc.contributor.authorKendal, E.
dc.contributor.authorSayar, M.S.
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-15T19:37:55Z
dc.date.available2025-02-15T19:37:55Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentArtuklu Universityen_US
dc.department-tempKendal E., Department of Crops and Animal Production, Kızıltepe Vocational Training High School, MardinArtuklu University, Kızıltepe, 47400, Mardin, Turkey; Sayar M.S., Department of Crops and Animal Production, Bismil Vocational Training High School, Dicle University, Bismil, Diyarbakır, 21500, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractThis research examined the adaptability of triticale genotypes in three sub-regions of Southeastern Anatolia that represent distinct agro ecological zones. The study was conducted using a total of 25 genotypes, including 20 advanced lines, three triticale varieties, one durum wheat variety, and one bread wheat variety. Yield and crop quality traits for these genotypes were assessed at four locations over the 2010–2011 growing season. The stability and superiority of genotypes were assessed in terms of crop traits including grain yield, yield components, and crop quality parameters using GGE biplot analysis. Three study locations showed distinct traits: Diyarbakir was found to be the most suitable overall location with a high stability value, Kızıltepe showed high grain yield, and Mardin showed superior crop quality traits. However, when all crop traits were analyzed with respect to location, crop quality parameters formed the first group, plant height (PH) and grain yield (GY) formed the second group, and heading time (HT) formed a third group. When the parameters were analyzed for genotypes, three different groups were formed, in which grain yield and thousand-grain weight (TGW) formed the first group, protein content (PC) and test weight (TW) formed the second group, HT and PH formed the third group. Consequently, the Sarıçanak 98 (durum wheat) and Nurkent (bread wheat), which are referred to as standard varieties in this study, as well as genotype lines 3, 7, 12, 13, 16, and 21 were considered suitable for cultivation in Southeastern Anatolia, whereas the remaining genotypes were below average with respect to overall performance. Furthermore, we found that the GGE biplot method generated highly useful results with high visual quality. © 2016, Pakistan Agricultural Scientists Forum. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount38
dc.identifier.endpage765en_US
dc.identifier.issn1018-7081
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84971441894
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage754en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12514/6198
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPakistan Agricultural Scientists Forumen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Animal and Plant Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectGenotype × Environment Interactionen_US
dc.subjectGge Biploten_US
dc.subjectSpring Triticaleen_US
dc.subjectTurkeyen_US
dc.titleThe Stability of Some Spring Triticale Genotypes Using Biplot Analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files