MAÜ GCRIS Standart veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Reading a City through Historical Documents: Dichotomy between Textuality and Visuality

dc.authoridhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2088-7094
dc.contributor.authorGünenç, Ömer Faruk
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-29T12:16:07Z
dc.date.available2019-12-29T12:16:07Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentMAÜ, Fakülteler, Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi, Mimarlık Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding a city, period, sociality and even a building through historical documents leads these records inevitably to instrumentalization. Documents-oriented studies could be based on two different routes. On the one hand, unpreserved spaces could be roughly and doubtfully rebuilt, on the other, any places maintained would be interpreted. In Turkey, the architectural academia has recently been dealt with these documents in terms of historiography along the two axes mentioned above. This increased interest also has revealed many terms such as structure of city, everyday life, domestic culture, in other words, diversely percepted spaces, periods and individuals. The purpose of this study is not to discuss the historiography of architecture conceptually. The main aim is to scrutinize the contents of historical documents such as house sales (hüccets) as an assessment tool for reading a city. In this regard house sales recorded in ser’iye sicils during the Ottoman Empire in the 19th century are questioned regarding housing culture in the case of the city of Mardin, and house sales are even problematized. The contents of these documents are significant in two ways. First, descriptions of space in records expose clearly the contents of houses. Thus, possibilities/impossibilities defined by the document intended to be uncovered. Second, there is an actual tension between textuality (historical records) and visuality (structure of the city) in the case of Mardin maintaining its own unique morphology. This tension also similarly has been at the heart of any interpretation of cities or buildings that were not managed to protect its existence.en_US
dc.description.citationGünenç, Ö.F., “Reading a City through Historical Documents: Dichotomy between Textuality and Visuality”, Invisibile Visibile: AISU International Conference Visible and Invisible Perceiving the City between Descriptions and Omissions, S.Adorno, G.Cristina and A. Rotondo (eds.), Scrim Edizioni, Catania, 2014, pp. 107-114.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Ömer Faruk Günenç (omerfarukgunenc@artuklu.edu.tr) on 2019-12-29T12:16:07Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Dichotomy between Textuality and Visuality.pdf: 558082 bytes, checksum: 3ef0c8c8f3fab874be05568ffc75e67b (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2019-12-29T12:16:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Dichotomy between Textuality and Visuality.pdf: 558082 bytes, checksum: 3ef0c8c8f3fab874be05568ffc75e67b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014en
dc.identifier.endpage114en_US
dc.identifier.startpage107en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12514/2079
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAISU International Conference Visible and Invisible Perceiving the City between Descriptions and Omissionsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Başka Kurum Yazarıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectTextuality, Visuality, Mardin, Historiographyen_US
dc.titleReading a City through Historical Documents: Dichotomy between Textuality and Visualityen_US
dc.typeConference Objecten_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Dichotomy between Textuality and Visuality.pdf
Size:
545 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.44 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: