MAÜ GCRIS Standart veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

A REVIEW OF MULTI OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION

dc.authoridhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4320-0198
dc.contributor.authorHüseyin Ahmetoğlu
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-30T09:09:47Z
dc.date.available2019-08-30T09:09:47Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentMAÜ, Meslek Yüksekokulları, Midyat Meslek Yüksekokulu, Bilgisayar Programcılığı Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractMerging systems, enhancing inter-disciplinary relations and increasing needs require multi objectives rather than a single objective in the optimization problems nowadays. However, the objectives are frequently conflicting. When an objective is improved, the other objective(s) may deteriorate. In the multi-objective optimization problems (MOOPs), the aim is to come up with the best solutions that can be an alternative for each other in terms of objective function values under the constraints caused by various reasons. During the last two decades, MOOPs and solution methods have been studied with great interest. It is possible to come across a MOOP in almost every discipline in the literature. MOOPs have been modelled and solved not only in the fields with more applications such as production, management, business administration, marketing, transportation and finance but also in the basic sciences such as chemistry, maths and statistics. Solution of MOOPs requires the simultaneous optimization of conflicting multi objectives. In MOOPs, an optimal solution set on which a compromise is reached among the conflicting objectives is obtained. In this study, the articles on multi-objective optimization written in 2015 and later are analysed and 61 articles are chosen among them. Classical and heuristic methods implemented for the solution of MOOPs presented in these articles are mentioned. The articles are classified according to their subject areas. The methodology used in each article is identified. According to their implementation areas, the multi-objective optimization methods and the areas they are implemented the most are discussed. The areas to be focused on in the future studies to obtain more robust results in the optimization are identified.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12514/1882
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartof3rd International Conference on Advanced Technology & Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryGazete Makalesi - Ulusalen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectMerging systems, enhancing inter-disciplinary relations and increasing needs require multi objectives rather than a single objective in the optimization problems nowadays. However, the objectives are frequently conflicting. When an objective is improved, the other objective(s) may deteriorate. In the multi-objective optimization problems (MOOPs), the aim is to come up with the best solutions that can be an alternative for each other in terms of objective function values under the constraints caused by various reasons. During the last two decades, MOOPs and solution methods have been studied with great interest. It is possible to come across a MOOP in almost every discipline in the literature. MOOPs have been modelled and solved not only in the fields with more applications such as production, management, business administration, marketing, transportation and finance but also in the basic sciences such as chemistry, maths and statistics. Solution of MOOPs requires the simultaneous optimization of conflicting multi objectives. In MOOPs, an optimal solution set on which a compromise is reached among the conflicting objectives is obtained. In this study, the articles on multi-objective optimization written in 2015 and later are analysed and 61 articles are chosen among them. Classical and heuristic methods implemented for the solution of MOOPs presented in these articles are mentioned. The articles are classified according to their subject areas. The methodology used in each article is identified. According to their implementation areas, the multi-objective optimization methods and the areas they are implemented the most are discussed. The areas to be focused on in the future studies to obtain more robust results in the optimization are identified.en_US
dc.titleA REVIEW OF MULTI OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATIONen_US
dc.typeConference Objecten_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
A Review of Multi Objective Optimization_EN.pdf
Size:
402.06 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.44 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: