MAÜ GCRIS Standart veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Alkhattaf, Hasan

Profile Picture
Name Variants
ALKHATTAF, Hasan
el-Hattaf, Hasan
Job Title
Doç. Dr.
Email Address
Main Affiliation
Department of Basic Islamic Sciences / Temel İslam Bilimleri Bölümü
Status
Former Staff
Website
ORCID ID
Scopus Author ID
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
Google Scholar ID
WoS Researcher ID

Sustainable Development Goals Report Points

SDG data could not be loaded because of an error. Please refresh the page or try again later.
Scholarly Output

4

Articles

4

Citation Count

0

Supervised Theses

0

Filters

2017 - 20184
Reset filters

Settings

Scholarly Output Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Man's Accountability for Deeds in Islam: Shari'ah vs. Theology
    (2017) Alkhattaf, Hasan; Department of Basic Islamic Sciences / Temel İslam Bilimleri Bölümü
    God has created Man and honored him, and one manifestation of this honoring is that God has commissioned Man and made him responsible for his actions. This commissioning or accountability, in fact, brings nothing to Man but happiness in this life and the hereafter. However, God has commissioned Man according to Man's mental ability, physical strength, and financial capacity, as evidenced by many texts from the Quran and Sunnah. Nevertheless, Al-Ash'ari believed that Man's accountability could exceed his capacity, and some others followed him in this belief. So, what stands beyond this peculiar belief, which is totally counters the known ease of Shariah? Does it have any historical or philosophical background? Before answering these questions, the paper attempts to define, according to theologians, the theory of accountability beyond human capacity, and it touches on its relation to attaching unbecoming things to God. The paper also attempts to discover any example that might support such belief.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    أثرُ تنزیھ لله عما لا یلیق بھ في اختلاف المتكلمین
    (Artuklu Akademi, 2018) Alkhattaf, Hasan; Department of Basic Islamic Sciences / Temel İslam Bilimleri Bölümü
    اختلف المُتكلمون من الأشعریة والماتریدیة والمعتزلة في مسائل عِدّة، ووصل الخلاف إلى رَمي كلٍ منھم الآخرَ بالتضلیل والاستخفاف بالشرع، وغالبا یكون الاختلاف بین المعتزلة من جھة وبین الأشعریة والماتریدیة من جھة أخرى، وأبرز خلافٍ شھده التاریخ بینھما كان في مسائل الإلھیات، وعند التَّحقیق نجد الكثیر من المسائل مرجِعُھا إلى الخلاف حول تنزیھ لله تعالى. حاولنا في ھذه الدراسة إبراز القضایا الكبرى التي یرجع فیھا الخلاف إلى تنزیھ لله تعالى، مُعتمدین في ذلك على ماكتبھ المتكلمون أنفسُھم ومقتصرین في دراستنا على المعتزلة، وعلى الأشعریة تعالى، والنصوص في القرآن ����� والماتریدیة كمُمَثلین لأھل السنة. وأبرز القضایا التي أثارت خلافا ھي الصفات الذاتیة والسنة الموھمة بتشبیھ لله بخلقھ، ورؤیة لله تعالى یوم القیامة، وخلق الأفعال والخلاف حول خلق القرآن.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Citation - WoS: 0
    The Legitimate Religious Truth and Its Linguistic Roots from the Perspective of the Theologians: The Concept of Faith in God as a Example
    (ATATURK UNIV, FAC THEOLOGY, 2018) Alkhattaf, Hasan; Department of Basic Islamic Sciences / Temel İslam Bilimleri Bölümü
    The legitimate religious truth is seen from more than one angle. Linguists, speakers and fundamentalists spoke about it. What we are concerned with here is the views of Kalam scholars. The controversy to the legitimate religious truth between Ahl al-Sunnah represented by Asha'riya and Maturidism represented by Mu'tazila is obvious. Mu'tazila separates the legitimate religious truth from linguistic rules, since religion gave it a new meaning which didn't exist before. While Asha'riya and Maturidism make language origin of the religious legitimate truth. Ibn Hazm was closer to Mu'tazilah as well as being prejudiced against Asha'riya. In the process of this disagreement a new disagreement was based on 'faith and its relationship to the works'. In this concept Mu'tazilah and Khawarij considered the works as a part of the faith, and this led Khawarij to takfeer, and led Mu'tazila to call this 'a position which is between two positions'. Contrary to this, in Asha'riya and Maturidism, which represent Ahl al-Sunnah, works are the complements of the basics of faith. This is what we are going to discuss in this research.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Citation - WoS: 0
    El-hakîkatu’ş-şer‘iyye ve Cuzûruha’l-lugaviyye Bi Nazari’lmütekellimîn: Mefhûmu'l-îmâni Billâhi Nemûzecen
    (2018) Alkhattaf, Hasan; Department of Basic Islamic Sciences / Temel İslam Bilimleri Bölümü
    Şeri hakikate farklı açılardan bakılmıştır. Usulcüler, dilciler ve kelamcılar şeri hakikat hakkında görüşlerini dile getirmişlerdir. Burada bizi ilgilendiren husus ise kelamcıların görüşüdür. Şeri hakikate bakış açısında Ehli sünneti temsil eden Maturidi ve Eşari ekolü ile Mutezile ekolü arasındaki ihtilaf açıktır. Mutezile ekolü şeri hakikati dil kurallarından tamamen ayırmıştır. Çünkü din, şeri hakikate önceden bulunmayan yeni anlamlar yüklemiştir. Eşari ve Maturidi ekolü ise şeri hakikat için dili temel almıştır. İbn- Hazm ise anlam açısından Eşari ekolüne ön yargılı olmakla beraber Mutezile ekolüne daha yakındır. Bu farklılığın üzerine ‘iman ve amelle alakası’ noktasında bir ihtilaf meydana gelmiştir. Mutezile ekolü ve Hariciler ameli, imandan bir parça saymışlardır, bu da Haricileri tekfir etmeye kadar götürmüştür. Mutezile ekolünde ise ‘İki makam ve mekân arasında bir mekân’ demelerine yol açmıştır. Ehli sünneti temsil eden Maturidi ve Eşari ekolünde ise bunun aksine amel, imanın tamamlayıcısıdır. Bu araştırmada bunu ele alacağız.