MAÜ GCRIS Standart veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Application of Ammi Model for Evaulation Spring Barley Genotypes in Multi-Environment Trials

dc.authorwosidKendal, Enver/J-4128-2018
dc.contributor.authorKendal, Enver
dc.contributor.authorTekdal, Sertac
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-01T22:58:34Z
dc.date.available2025-05-01T22:58:34Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentArtuklu Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Kendal, Enver; Tekdal, Sertac] Mardin Artuklu Univ, Kiziltepe Vocat Training High Sch, Dept Crops & Anim Prod, Kiziltepe, Mardin, Turkey; [Tekdal, Sertac] GAP Int Agr Res & Training Ctr, TR-21100 Diyarbakir, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of study was to evaluate the yield performance of genotypes and stability, environments and G x E interaction of 12 spring barley genotypes in multi-environment trials. The trials were implemented in respect to a integrate arrangement complex style with four replications. The AMMI (Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction) analysis was made to estimate grain yield and understand G x E interaction patterns. Analysis indicated that the major contributions to treatment sum of squares were environments (81.4%), GE (10.3%) and genotypes (8.3%), respectively; suggesting that grain yield of genotypes was effected environmental conditions. PCA 1 and PCA 2 axes (Principal component) were significant (0.01) and supplied to 68.30% of the complete G x E interaction. The AMMI analysis revealed that E3 and E5 were more stable and high productive; mean while E6 and E7 were unstable and nominal efficient environments. According to stability variance, the genotypes (G1, G3, G6 and G9) were the productive and more stable; meanwhile G4 and G5 were low productive and stable genotypes. Moreover, G2 were the best productive to all environments without E2. The G x E model exposed according to AMMI analysis recommended that G2 shown candidates and registered as Kendal, because of wide adaptability with high performances in all environments.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.endpage620en_US
dc.identifier.issn0253-5416
dc.identifier.issn2079-9926
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage613en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12514/8863
dc.identifier.volume45en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000383935400023
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBangladesh Botanical Socen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAmmi Analysesen_US
dc.subjectSpring Barleyen_US
dc.subjectGge Biploten_US
dc.subjectYielden_US
dc.subjectStabilityen_US
dc.titleApplication of Ammi Model for Evaulation Spring Barley Genotypes in Multi-Environment Trialsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication1fd3426d-db3d-45ce-a101-a622abc48afa
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery1fd3426d-db3d-45ce-a101-a622abc48afa

Files