Application of Ammi Model for Evaulation Spring Barley Genotypes in Multi-Environment Trials
dc.authorwosid | Kendal, Enver/J-4128-2018 | |
dc.contributor.author | Kendal, Enver | |
dc.contributor.author | Tekdal, Sertac | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-01T22:58:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-05-01T22:58:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.department | Artuklu University | en_US |
dc.department-temp | [Kendal, Enver; Tekdal, Sertac] Mardin Artuklu Univ, Kiziltepe Vocat Training High Sch, Dept Crops & Anim Prod, Kiziltepe, Mardin, Turkey; [Tekdal, Sertac] GAP Int Agr Res & Training Ctr, TR-21100 Diyarbakir, Turkey | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of study was to evaluate the yield performance of genotypes and stability, environments and G x E interaction of 12 spring barley genotypes in multi-environment trials. The trials were implemented in respect to a integrate arrangement complex style with four replications. The AMMI (Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction) analysis was made to estimate grain yield and understand G x E interaction patterns. Analysis indicated that the major contributions to treatment sum of squares were environments (81.4%), GE (10.3%) and genotypes (8.3%), respectively; suggesting that grain yield of genotypes was effected environmental conditions. PCA 1 and PCA 2 axes (Principal component) were significant (0.01) and supplied to 68.30% of the complete G x E interaction. The AMMI analysis revealed that E3 and E5 were more stable and high productive; mean while E6 and E7 were unstable and nominal efficient environments. According to stability variance, the genotypes (G1, G3, G6 and G9) were the productive and more stable; meanwhile G4 and G5 were low productive and stable genotypes. Moreover, G2 were the best productive to all environments without E2. The G x E model exposed according to AMMI analysis recommended that G2 shown candidates and registered as Kendal, because of wide adaptability with high performances in all environments. | en_US |
dc.description.woscitationindex | Science Citation Index Expanded | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 620 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0253-5416 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2079-9926 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q4 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 613 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12514/8863 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 45 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000383935400023 | |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q4 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Bangladesh Botanical Soc | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Ammi Analyses | en_US |
dc.subject | Spring Barley | en_US |
dc.subject | Gge Biplot | en_US |
dc.subject | Yield | en_US |
dc.subject | Stability | en_US |
dc.title | Application of Ammi Model for Evaulation Spring Barley Genotypes in Multi-Environment Trials | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 1fd3426d-db3d-45ce-a101-a622abc48afa | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 1fd3426d-db3d-45ce-a101-a622abc48afa |