MAÜ GCRIS Standart veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Application of Ammi Model for Evaulation Spring Barley Genotypes in Multi-Environment Trials

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2016

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Bangladesh Botanical Soc

Open Access Color

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Organizational Unit
Department of Seed Production / Tohumculuk Teknolojisi Bölümü
Programın amacı; özellikle yabancı döllenen bitkilerde çok büyük bir tohumculuk pazarı oluşması, çok uluslu birçok şirketin Türkiye’de tohum üretme işlerini gerçekleştirmesi nedeniyle bu işlerde görev alabilecek teknik donanımlı ara eleman yetiştirmektir. Bununla birlikte birçok kamu araştırma enstitülerinde ıslah çalışmaları yürütüldüğünden bu kurumlardaki tohum üretme işlerini takip edecek olan yardımcı teknik personelin yetiştirilmesini sağlamaktır. Mezunlar Tekniker unvanını almaktadır. Bitkisel üretim ile çalışma alanlarında iş bulma imkânları olmaktadır.

Journal Issue

Events

Abstract

The aim of study was to evaluate the yield performance of genotypes and stability, environments and G x E interaction of 12 spring barley genotypes in multi-environment trials. The trials were implemented in respect to a integrate arrangement complex style with four replications. The AMMI (Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction) analysis was made to estimate grain yield and understand G x E interaction patterns. Analysis indicated that the major contributions to treatment sum of squares were environments (81.4%), GE (10.3%) and genotypes (8.3%), respectively; suggesting that grain yield of genotypes was effected environmental conditions. PCA 1 and PCA 2 axes (Principal component) were significant (0.01) and supplied to 68.30% of the complete G x E interaction. The AMMI analysis revealed that E3 and E5 were more stable and high productive; mean while E6 and E7 were unstable and nominal efficient environments. According to stability variance, the genotypes (G1, G3, G6 and G9) were the productive and more stable; meanwhile G4 and G5 were low productive and stable genotypes. Moreover, G2 were the best productive to all environments without E2. The G x E model exposed according to AMMI analysis recommended that G2 shown candidates and registered as Kendal, because of wide adaptability with high performances in all environments.

Description

Keywords

Ammi Analyses, Spring Barley, Gge Biplot, Yield, Stability

Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL

Fields of Science

Citation

WoS Q

Q4

Scopus Q

Q4

Source

Volume

45

Issue

3

Start Page

613

End Page

620