Modal Foundationalism in Brandom’s Interpretation of Hegel

dc.contributor.author Yirmibeş, M.
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-18T13:22:13Z
dc.date.accessioned 2025-09-17T14:28:34Z
dc.date.available 2023-12-18T13:22:13Z
dc.date.available 2025-09-17T14:28:34Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.description.abstract Brandom’s reading of Hegel’s metaphysics offers an excitingly rich interpretation within the context of contemporary modal metaphysics. Brandom reads Hegel’s determinate negation in the way that the concepts of material incompatibility and material consequence relations operate. Brandom recognizes incompatibility as a modal concept and places it as a primitive in the foundation of Hegel’s metaphysics. This paper examines of Brandom’s modal foundationalist claim in comparison to how Hegel conceives of modality in his Logic. Upon this examination, the paper suggests that Brandom’s interpretation remains problematically indifferent to the anti-foundationalist aspect of Hegel’s Logic and Hegel’s understanding of modality. © 2023, Universidad de Malaga. All rights reserved. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.24310/Studiahegelianastheg.v9i.16188
dc.identifier.issn 2444-0809
dc.identifier.issn 2792-176X
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85180251931
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.24310/Studiahegelianastheg.v9i.16188
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12514/9711
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Universidad de Malaga en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Studia Hegeliana en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Determinate Negation en_US
dc.subject Difference en_US
dc.subject Foundationalism en_US
dc.subject Incompatibility en_US
dc.subject Modality en_US
dc.title Modal Foundationalism in Brandom’s Interpretation of Hegel en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.endpage 74
gdc.description.scopusquality Q2
gdc.description.startpage 65
gdc.description.volume 9
gdc.identifier.openalex W4392569422
gdc.index.type Scopus en_US
gdc.oaire.accesstype GOLD
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 0.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.5349236E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen true
gdc.oaire.keywords Determinate Negation
gdc.oaire.keywords Modality
gdc.oaire.keywords Incompatibility
gdc.oaire.popularity 2.1399287E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.0
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.37
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 1
gdc.scopus.citedcount 1
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 39ccb12e-5b2b-4b51-b989-14849cf90cae
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 39ccb12e-5b2b-4b51-b989-14849cf90cae

Files