Investigation of the Necessity of Aspiration During the Intramuscular Injection Administered in the Ventrogluteal Site and Its Effect on Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Loading...

Date
2023
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Abstract
This experimental study, which was conducted to examine the necessity of aspiration procedure and its effect on pain in
intramuscular (IM) injections made into the ventrogluteal site (VGS), is randomized controlled and double-blind. The patients
in the study group (n = 834) were assigned to the IM group with the aspiration period of 5 to 10 seconds (Implementation
Group A-IGA), the aspiration period of 1 to 2 seconds (Control Group-CG), and no aspiration (Implementation Group
B-IGB) according to stratified block randomization list. Patients’ pain levels were evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale
(VAS). No bleeding was observed when aspiration periods of 1 to 2 and 5 to 10 seconds were followed during the injections
administered to the VGS. The difference between the pain medians of patients in IGB and the CG were not significant
(p = .521). It can be said that there is no need to apply aspiration in IM applied into the VGS if the correct site is determined.
Description
ORCID
Keywords
Pain, Clinical research areas, Nursing interventions, Patient safety, nursing interventions, Clinical research areas, Syndromes, Nursing interventions, Pain, pain measurement, Injections, Intramuscular, Patient safety, intramuscular drug administration, syndromes, randomized controlled trial, clinical research areas, patient safety, Humans, pain, controlled study, human, procedures, Pain Measurement
Fields of Science
03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, 0305 other medical science
Citation
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
2
Source
Clinical Nursing Research
Volume
32
Issue
4
Start Page
821
End Page
829
Collections
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 2
Scopus : 4
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 10


