MAÜ GCRIS Standart veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Relationship Between Chlorophyll and Other Features in Durum Wheat (triticum Turgidum L. Var. Durum) Using Spad and Biplot Analyses

dc.authorscopusid36640094400
dc.contributor.authorKendal, E.
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-15T19:37:51Z
dc.date.available2025-02-15T19:37:51Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentArtuklu Universityen_US
dc.department-tempKendal E., Department of Crops and Animal Production, Kiziltepe Vocational Training High School, Artuklu University, Kiziltepe, Mardin, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate Genotype×Environment Interaction (GEI) of chlorophyll meter readings (SPAD) of ten durum wheat cultivars, using data obtained from multi-environment trials during two years, at eight locations. Stability and genotypic superiority for SPAD reading was identified using ANOVA and GGE biplot analysis. Furthermore, the interrelationships among SPAD reading and other yield components and cultivars-by-traits, environment-by-traits, and cultivars-by-environment were studied using scatter, ranking, and comparison of biplot techniques. Substantial variations were found among SPAD reading, yield components, and quality criteria as related to each other, environment, and cultivars. There were positive correlations among SPAD reading with GY, some quality criteria [Protein Content (PC); Wet Gluten (WG), Vitreous Kernels (VIT)], and yield components [stalks m-2 (SS); ear m-2 (ES); Plant Height (PH), Length of Spike (LS)], while Maturation Time (MT) had negative correlation with SPAD. Also, there was relationship among SPAD and SC (Semolina Color) and SDS (Mini Sedimentation) with obtuse angles (< 900), but the correlation was not significant. The GGE biplot indicated that Kızıltepe environment (E6) and Eyyubi cultivar (G3) were the best in terms of SPAD reading. The GGE biplot provided useful information for experimentation of SPAD readings of cultivars when grown under multienvironment. Moreover, SPAD should be considered as the preferred tool, when the breeder is looking for the best and useful tool to determine flag leaf chlorophyll content. © 2015, Tarbiat Modares University. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by GCRIS Admin (gcris@artuklu.edu.tr) on 2025-02-15T19:37:50Z No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2025-02-15T19:37:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2015en
dc.identifier.citationcount20
dc.identifier.endpage1886en_US
dc.identifier.issn1680-7073
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84951976002
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage1873en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12514/6194
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.institutionauthorKendal, E.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTarbiat Modares Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Agricultural Science and Technologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectChlorophyllen_US
dc.subjectCultivar-Environment Interactionen_US
dc.subjectGge Biploten_US
dc.subjectWheaten_US
dc.titleRelationship Between Chlorophyll and Other Features in Durum Wheat (triticum Turgidum L. Var. Durum) Using Spad and Biplot Analysesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files