Malposition in Central Venous Catheterization and the Use of Ultrasonography: Is the Presence of Turbulent Flow an Alternative to Chest Radiography

dc.contributor.author Aydemir, Semih
dc.contributor.author Çelik, Enes
dc.contributor.author Kılınç, Metin
dc.contributor.author Demir, İbrahim
dc.contributor.author İpek, Yusuf
dc.contributor.author Vildan,
dc.date.accessioned 2025-10-15T16:08:35Z
dc.date.available 2025-10-15T16:08:35Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.description.abstract Aim: To evaluate the rate of malposition in central venous catheterization (CVC) procedures performed by expert physicians in our intensive care units using ultrasound (US). Additionally, we investigated whether the assessment of turbulent flow via USG could eliminate the need for chest radiography and whether USG could serve as a viable alternative to radiographic confirmation. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted between June 2024 and January 2025 in the intensive care units of Mardin Training and Research Hospital. A total of 162 adult patients who underwent CVC placement were included. Patients were divided into three groups: (1) Conventional CVC placement (n = 53), (2) US-guided CVC placement (n = 51), and (3) US-guided CVC placement with turbulent flow assessment (n = 58). The presence of turbulent flow in the right atrium was evaluated using a rapid injection of saline. The malposition rate and complications were compared among groups. Results: The malposition rate was significantly lower in the US + Turbulent Flow Group (1.5%, n = 1/58) compared to the Conventional CVC Group (7.5%, n = 4/53) and the USG-Guided Group (4.3%, n = 2/51) (p = 0.022). Additionally, no complications were observed in the US-Guided and US + Turbulent Flow Groups, whereas the complication rate in the Conventional CVC Group was 6.67% (n = 4/53) (p = 0.010). Regression analysis showed that turbulent flow detection was significantly associated with correct catheter positioning (p = 0.018, Beta = 2.361). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that US, particularly with turbulent flow assessment, is a highly effective method for confirming CVC placement and may reduce the need for routine chest radiography. The use of US- guided techniques significantly lowers the malposition rate and enhances patient safety. Incorporating turbulent flow assessment into clinical protocols may improve the accuracy of catheter placement and minimize complications. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.30714/j-ebr.2025.241
dc.identifier.issn 2618-6454
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.30714/j-ebr.2025.241
dc.identifier.uri https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/en/yayin/detay/1348598/malposition-in-central-venous-catheterization-and-the-use-of-ultrasonography-is-the-presence-of-turbulent-flow-an-alternative-to-chest-radiography
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12514/9860
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Experimental Biomedical Research en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.title Malposition in Central Venous Catheterization and the Use of Ultrasonography: Is the Presence of Turbulent Flow an Alternative to Chest Radiography
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial true
gdc.description.department Artuklu University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi,Mardin Artuklu Üniversitesi,Mardin Artuklu Üniversitesi,T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı,T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı,T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı en_US
gdc.description.endpage 110 en_US
gdc.description.issue 2 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality N/A
gdc.description.startpage 99 en_US
gdc.description.volume 8 en_US
gdc.description.wosquality N/A
gdc.identifier.openalex W4408955576
gdc.identifier.trdizinid 1348598
gdc.index.type TR-Dizin
gdc.oaire.accesstype GOLD
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 0.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.4895952E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.keywords turbulent flow
gdc.oaire.keywords malposition
gdc.oaire.keywords Central Venous Catheterization
gdc.oaire.keywords direct radiography
gdc.oaire.keywords ultrasonography
gdc.oaire.popularity 2.7494755E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.openalex.collaboration International
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.0
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.13
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 10%
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.virtual.author Çelik, Enes
gdc.virtual.author Kılınç, Metin
relation.isAuthorOfPublication e67459e5-7764-4aec-b7b0-2d9801aea698
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 95184883-c92a-48b7-828b-95de8c21c42e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery e67459e5-7764-4aec-b7b0-2d9801aea698
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 699b05f8-13b6-432a-a67f-7cf80b49367a
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 3f27f943-1869-4252-af6a-9ec8b114c727
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 39ccb12e-5b2b-4b51-b989-14849cf90cae
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 699b05f8-13b6-432a-a67f-7cf80b49367a

Files