MAÜ GCRIS Standart veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

EVALUATION OF THIRTEEN DURUM WHEAT (TRITICUM DURUM DESF.) GENOTYPES SUITABLE FOR MULTIPLE ENVIRONMENTS USING GGE BIPLOT ANALYSIS

dc.authorid0000-0002-7884-5463
dc.authorscopusid57024050900
dc.authorwosidAAP-4767-2021
dc.contributor.authorKızılgeçi, Ferhat
dc.contributor.authorAlbayrak, Önder
dc.contributor.authorYıldırım, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-20T11:09:03Z
dc.date.available2024-02-20T11:09:03Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentMAÜ, Meslek Yüksekokulları, Kızıltepe Meslek Yüksekokulu, Tohumculuk Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractThe present study was undertaken to identify the best durum wheat genotypes suitable for the South-Eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey with desirable grain yield and quality. In the context, thirteen spring durum wheat genotypes were evalu ated in four environmental condition of the target region in consecutive two growing seasons in the year 2013-14 and 2014-15. The stability and supe riority of genotypes, and favorable testing environ ments were described by using ANOVA and GGE biplot analysis (genotype, genotype x environment). Genotype, environment and GEI (genotype x envi ronment interaction) was found to be highly signifi cant for multiple traits. The total variation of PCI (principles component) and PC2 was calculated 90% for ETI (environment trait interaction), 57.35 for GTI (genotype trait interaction), and 87.5% for GE interaction. The results of total variation of ETI was found higher than GTI and GEI. On the other hand, the biplot analysis showed that four mega environments occurred among ETI and three envi ronments (E1, E2 and E3) correlated with different traits, while environments E4 did not correlated with any traits. The environment E1 was found the best for Grain yield, test weight, thousand kernel weight and starch content, E2 for L*, b*, SPAD, and E3 for zeleny sedimentation, protein content and wet gluten content. In the biplot analysis, the environments divided three sector based on traits. Among the genotypes, the genotype G8 was per formed the best in all tested environments, while G9 was found the best based on all traits. The re sults of the study showed that GGE biplot analysis can be used as a good tool to identity of the most suitable environment in terms of all the characteris tics as well as to identify the best genotypes for future breeding program.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Ferhat Kızılgeçi (ferhatkizilgeci@artuklu.edu.tr) on 2024-02-18T19:08:23Z No. of bitstreams: 1 62FEB_19_00805cr3.pdf: 649601 bytes, checksum: 2f476e6c44062d3894bf3d16d1487e65 (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Hüsnü Aktaş (husnuaktas@artuklu.edu.tr) on 2024-02-20T11:09:03Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 62FEB_19_00805cr3.pdf: 649601 bytes, checksum: 2f476e6c44062d3894bf3d16d1487e65 (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2024-02-20T11:09:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 62FEB_19_00805cr3.pdf: 649601 bytes, checksum: 2f476e6c44062d3894bf3d16d1487e65 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019en
dc.identifier.endpage6882en_US
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.startpage6873en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12514/5806
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000485852800062
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.institutionauthorKızılgeçi, Ferhat
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFresenius Environmental Bulletinen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası - Editör Denetimli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectGGE biplot, protein, stability, interaction, semolina colouren_US
dc.titleEVALUATION OF THIRTEEN DURUM WHEAT (TRITICUM DURUM DESF.) GENOTYPES SUITABLE FOR MULTIPLE ENVIRONMENTS USING GGE BIPLOT ANALYSISen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
62FEB_19_00805cr3.pdf
Size:
634.38 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.44 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: