This item is non-discoverable
Türker, Habip
Loading...
Name Variants
Turker, Habip
Habip Türker
Habip Türker
Job Title
Doç. Dr.
Email Address
Main Affiliation
Department of Philosophy / Felsefe Bölümü
Status
Former Staff
Website
ORCID ID
Scopus Author ID
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
Google Scholar ID
WoS Researcher ID
Sustainable Development Goals Report Points
SDG data could not be loaded because of an error. Please refresh the page or try again later.
Scholarly Output
3
Articles
2
Citation Count
0
Supervised Theses
0
3 results
Scholarly Output Search Results
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Conference Object Citation - WoS: 0BEAUTY AND ITS PROJECTION IN CHRISTIAN AND ISLAMIC TRADITION(SPRINGER, 2011) Türker, Habip; Tymieniecka, AT; Department of Philosophy / Felsefe BölümüThis essay deals with the conception of beauty and its manner of reflection in Christian and Islamic tradition concisely. Thus some influential thinkers in both traditions are chosen in order to exemplify the common conception of beauty. Christian tradition embraced Greek conception of beauty and art; however it brought a metaphysical depth to Greek conception of beauty in the hands of Christian thinkers. The conception of beauty in Islamic tradition was inspired by the religion and the Hellenistic heritage. However, the most elaborated theories on beauty in both Christian and Islamic tradition were done by mystic philosophers. In both traditions beauty is interpreted as something ontological. Accordingly, beauty is being, not a property added to it accidentally. However, the projections of this common conception of beauty differentiate from each other in some respects. While Christian art emphasizes divine intimacy and tragedy in naturalist perspective, Islamic art concentrates on the statement of the unity, transcendence, and eternity of God in stylized form. Yet, this essay does not overlook counter-examples and different artistic ages in the history.Article Yunus Emre'de şiirsel imkânın görüngübilimi(2011) Türker, Habip; Department of Philosophy / Felsefe BölümüBu makale, Yunus Emre'nin şiirlerini görüngübilimsel bir perspektiften şiirsel bir imkan olarak okumayı denemektedir. Bizi varlık, hakikat ve zamansallık başlıkları altında Yunus Emre'nin felsefi-şiirsel dünyasında bir yolculuğa çıkarmaktadır. Yunus'a göre, varlıkta değişme değil, ancak tecelli söz konusudur. Bununla beraber varlık-oluş karşıtlığı yoktur; hatta varlık, oluşun imkanının temelidir. Tanrı, Varlık ve Aşk özdeştir. Varlığa duyulan bir aşk olan yokluk Yunus Emre için olumsuz bir anlam içermez. Onda zamansallık bir "orada-bulunmadurumu/ kesiti" değil, fakat bir "oradangeçmehali"dir. Bu yüzden zamansallık insanda bir yokluk, bir yaşanmamışlık hissi olarak belirir. İnsanda yokluk ve yaşanmamışla hissi olarak zamanlılık temelde insanın varolma tarzıdır.Article Citation - WoS: 1Citation - Scopus: 2Horkheimer's Criticism of Husserl(SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC, 2013) Türker, Habip; Department of Philosophy / Felsefe BölümüThis article focuses on Max Horkheimer's criticism of Husserl's phenomenology in basic philosophical matters such as method, theory, logic, truth, metaphysics, etc. Horkheimer objects to Husserl's conception of philosophy as a mathesis universalis and of science as relativistic research. However, he finds Husserl's criticism of scientific rationalism the most important step for the legitimacy of philosophy. According to him, Husserl's method is intended to be a science of apriority. But his understanding of apriority is static, is radically abstract, and overlooks the dialectical relation. Therefore, his method is ahistorical and undialectical. Horkheimer does not interpret Husserl's idealism in the sense of classical idealism. However, he believes that the positivistic and Cartesian implications in Husserl's philosophy made his method less fruitful in concrete situations. Consequently, he calls Husserl's phenomenology abstract positivism, traditional theory and a bourgeois ideology. Horkheimer's critique focuses on Husserl's early period of phenomenology.
