Reflexions on the Relationship Between Political Symbolism and Political Power
Loading...

Date
2020
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Rector CIU Cyprus Int Univ
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Political power refers to various means in order to keep its audience under its influence and to manipulate them, as it desires. Perhaps the most effective of these is symbolism. Using symbol and symbolic action is one of the most powerful way of establishing group identity and the most direct way of communicating. Especially the owner of political power benefit from this power effectively. By using it, political legitimacy can be established, as well as an invisible dialogue between political actors and citizens can be managed. Thus, it is easier to develop policy in order to constitute and maintain order. In this article, this instrumentality is examined in the discussion of symbolism and power. In the light of the data obtained from the conceptual and theoretical literature, the relationship between symbol and power has been discussed in different angles. In addition, it was questioned that the politics is carried out by the symbols and the masses are politicized by the same way. It can be said that an invisible dialogue can be created between the political power holders and people; power owners not only can easily manipulate people's emotions and knowledge but also can transfer its power from generation to generation through the political symbols.
Description
ORCID
Keywords
Political Symbols, Symbolism, Power, Manipulation, Politics, Kültürel Çalışmalar, Siyasi Bilimler, Antropoloji, Sanat ve Edebiyat, Anthropology, siyasal sembol;sembolizm;iktidar;manipülasyon, Creative Arts and Writing
Fields of Science
0301 basic medicine, 0303 health sciences, 03 medical and health sciences
Citation
WoS Q
N/A
Scopus Q
Q4

OpenCitations Citation Count
2
Source
Folklor/Edebiyat-Folklore
Volume
26
Issue
2
Start Page
377
End Page
392
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 0
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 5
Google Scholar™


