Evolving Approach in Nephron-Sparing Surgery: Has Anything Changed From Open Surgery To Laparoscopy

dc.contributor.author Ergun, Muslum
dc.contributor.author Sagir, Suleyman
dc.contributor.author Akyuz, Osman
dc.contributor.author Akman, Ramazan Yavuz
dc.date.accessioned 2025-02-15T19:38:57Z
dc.date.accessioned 2025-09-17T14:28:27Z
dc.date.available 2025-02-15T19:38:57Z
dc.date.available 2025-09-17T14:28:27Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.description.abstract Objective: This study aimed to provide valuable insights into the comparative efficacy of different surgical approaches fornephron-sparing surgery (NSS) and contribute to the existing literature in this field. Materials and Methods: This study included patients who underwent NSS for small renal masses between January 2016 andMarch 2024. A total of 97 patients (41 in the open approach group, 56 in the laparoscopic approach group) with demographic,radiological, intraoperative, renal functional, and oncological follow-up data were included. Three different anatomical scoringsystems (R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score, PADUA score and C-index) were utilised to assess tumour location and estimate prox-imity to the hilum and collecting system. Results: In the open nephron-sparing surgery (ONSS) and laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery (LNSS) groups, the mean kid-ney tumour diameters (SD) were 5.20 +/- 2.30 and 4.90 +/- 2.10, which were similar in both surgical method groups (p= 0.061).However, tumours treated with ONSS had significantly more adverse morphometric features (p<0.05). For ONSS and LNSSgroups, the mean R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores (SD) were 6.15 +/- 2.04 and 5.2 +/- 1.4 (p= 0.032), respectively; The mean PADUAscores (SD) were 7.46 +/- 1.14 and 6.8 +/- 1.0 (p= 0.049), respectively; And the mean C-index (SD) scores were 1.39 +/- 0.4 and 1.37 +/- 0.5 (p= 0.062), respectively. No significant differences were found in the mean tumour diameter (cm) (Inter Quantile Range(IQR)) distribution of both groups (p= 0.058). Despite the slight increase in transfusion rate in the LNSS group, estimated bloodloss (EBL), transfusion rates, and length of hospital stay were similar in both groups. Conclusions: Although LNSS does not appear superior in terms of intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay and transfu-sion rate, it provides comparable long-term outcomes to ONSS. Our study suggests that when matched with nephrometry scores,LNSS can achieve similar outcomes to ONSS en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20247707.101
dc.identifier.issn 0004-0614
dc.identifier.issn 1576-8260
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85203266843
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20247707.101
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12514/9629
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Iniestares, S.A. en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Archivos Espanoles de Urologia en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Renal Cell Carcinoma en_US
dc.subject Partial en_US
dc.subject Laparoscopic Surgery en_US
dc.subject Open Surgery en_US
dc.subject Nephrometry en_US
dc.title Evolving Approach in Nephron-Sparing Surgery: Has Anything Changed From Open Surgery To Laparoscopy en_US
dc.title Evolving Approach in Nephron-Sparing Surgery: Has Anything Changed From Open Surgery to Laparoscopy
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.scopusid 57205744851
gdc.author.scopusid 6505868909
gdc.author.scopusid 56531630200
gdc.author.scopusid 57222670818
gdc.author.wosid Sagir, Suleyman/Iam-8192-2023
gdc.author.wosid Ergün, Müslüm/Aar-9534-2021
gdc.author.wosid Akman, Yavuz/Aad-3028-2020
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department Artuklu University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Ergun, Muslum; Akyuz, Osman; Akman, Ramazan Yavuz] Atlas Univ Med Hosp, Urol, TR-34200 Istanbul, Turkiye; [Sagir, Suleyman] Mardin Artuklu Univ, Urol, TR-47100 Mardin, Turkiye en_US
gdc.description.endpage 731 en_US
gdc.description.issue 7 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q3
gdc.description.startpage 726 en_US
gdc.description.volume 77 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
gdc.description.wosquality Q4
gdc.identifier.openalex W4402064068
gdc.identifier.pmid 39238295
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:001309506900001
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.index.type PubMed
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 0.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.4895952E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.keywords Male
gdc.oaire.keywords Treatment Outcome
gdc.oaire.keywords Humans
gdc.oaire.keywords Laparoscopy
gdc.oaire.keywords Female
gdc.oaire.keywords Nephrons
gdc.oaire.keywords Middle Aged
gdc.oaire.keywords Organ Sparing Treatments
gdc.oaire.keywords Nephrectomy
gdc.oaire.keywords Kidney Neoplasms
gdc.oaire.keywords Retrospective Studies
gdc.oaire.keywords Aged
gdc.oaire.popularity 2.3737945E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.0
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.27
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.plumx.mendeley 1
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 0
gdc.scopus.citedcount 0
gdc.virtual.author Sağır, Süleyman
gdc.wos.citedcount 0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication c9134177-e6b4-49f5-b988-bffb4e620b29
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery c9134177-e6b4-49f5-b988-bffb4e620b29
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 699b05f8-13b6-432a-a67f-7cf80b49367a
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 3f27f943-1869-4252-af6a-9ec8b114c727
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 39ccb12e-5b2b-4b51-b989-14849cf90cae
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 699b05f8-13b6-432a-a67f-7cf80b49367a

Files