Relationship Between Chlorophyll and Other Features in Durum Wheat (Triticum Turgidum L. Var. Durum) Using Spad and Biplot Analyses

dc.contributor.author Kendal, E.
dc.contributor.author Kendal, Enver
dc.contributor.other 16.02. Department of Seed Production / Tohumculuk Teknolojisi Bölümü
dc.contributor.other 16. School of Vocational Higher School of Kızıltepe/ Kızıltepe Meslek Yüksekokulu
dc.contributor.other 01. Mardin Artuklu University / Mardin Artuklu Üniversitesi
dc.date.accessioned 2025-09-18T11:51:51Z
dc.date.available 2025-09-18T11:51:51Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.description.abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate GenotypexEnvironment Interaction (GEI) of chlorophyll meter readings (SPAD) of ten durum wheat cultivars, using data obtained from multi-environment trials during two years, at eight locations. Stability and genotypic superiority for SPAD reading was identified using ANOVA and GGE biplot analysis. Furthermore, the interrelationships among SPAD reading and other yield components and cultivars-by-traits, environment-by-traits, and cultivars-by-environment were studied using scatter, ranking, and comparison of biplot techniques. Substantial variations were found among SPAD reading, yield components, and quality criteria as related to each other, environment, and cultivars. There were positive correlations among SPAD reading with GY, some quality criteria [Protein Content (PC); Wet Gluten (WG), Vitreous Kernels (VIT)], and yield components [stalks m(-2) (SS); ear m(-2) (ES); Plant Height (PH), Length of Spike (LS)], while Maturation Time (MT) had negative correlation with SPAD. Also, there was relationship among SPAD and SC (Semolina Color) and SDS (Mini Sedimentation) with obtuse angles (<90(0)), but the correlation was not significant. The GGE biplot indicated that Kiziltepe environment (E6) and Eyyubi cultivar (G3) were the best in terms of SPAD reading. The GGE biplot provided useful information for experimentation of SPAD readings of cultivars when grown under multi-environment. Moreover, SPAD should be considered as the preferred tool, when the breeder is looking for the best and useful tool to determine flag leaf chlorophyll content. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 20
dc.identifier.issn 1680-7073
dc.identifier.issn 2345-3737
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-84951976002
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12514/9752
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Tarbiat Modares Univ en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Chlorophyll en_US
dc.subject Cultivar-Environment Interaction en_US
dc.subject Gge Biplot en_US
dc.subject Wheat en_US
dc.title Relationship Between Chlorophyll and Other Features in Durum Wheat (Triticum Turgidum L. Var. Durum) Using Spad and Biplot Analyses en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.institutional Kendal, E.
gdc.author.wosid Kendal, Enver/J-4128-2018
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text
gdc.description.department Artuklu University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Kendal, E.] Mardin Artuklu Univ, Kiziltepe Vocat Training High Sch, Dept Crops & Anim Prod, Kiziltepe, Mardin, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.endpage 1886 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q2
gdc.description.startpage 1873 en_US
gdc.description.volume 17 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
gdc.description.wosquality Q3
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000374286400019
gdc.scopus.citedcount 21
gdc.wos.citedcount 20

Files