MAÜ GCRIS Standart veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

How Was the Academic Incentive Plan Reflected on Performance: Comparative Analysis of 2016 To 2017

dc.authoridBolat, Yusuf Islam/0000-0002-6120-3157
dc.authoridGoksu, Idris/0000-0002-7120-6562
dc.authorwosidbolat, yusuf islam/AAU-5517-2020
dc.authorwosidGoksu, Idris/AAP-7275-2020
dc.contributor.authorGoksu, Idris
dc.contributor.authorBolat, Yusuf Islam
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-15T19:35:19Z
dc.date.available2025-02-15T19:35:19Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentArtuklu Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Goksu, Idris] Mardin Artuklu Univ, Egitim Bilimleri Bolumu, Edebiyat Fak, Mardin, Turkey; [Bolat, Yusuf Islam] Dicle Univ, Bilgisayar & Ogretim Teknol Egitimi Bolumu, Ziya Gokalp Egitim Fak, Diyarbakir, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionBolat, Yusuf Islam/0000-0002-6120-3157; Goksu, Idris/0000-0002-7120-6562en_US
dc.description.abstractWhen evaluating academic performance, research criteria are taken into consideration as well as quality of the instructional delivery. Scientific research is usually carried out by universities. The impact of the academic incentive plan, which was initiated in 2016 in Turkey, can be revealed by comparing the academic incentive results of 2017 with the results of the previous year. The aim of this study is to compare the results of the academic incentive plan for 2016 and 2017 and to examine them in terms of universities, titles, faculties and gender. As a result of this study, 67 academic incentive reports were examined, and it was found that the rate of academic incentives increased by approximately 12 points. Similarly, the average academic incentive score increased by 8.5 points. Associate professor, professor, assistant professor, research assistant and others were ranked as the academic titles receiving the highest amount of incentive, respectively as determined by the analyses performed on the basis of the titles, and it was found out that this order did not change in 2017 either. Our gender analysis revealed that the ratio of academic incentives given to the males increased by approximately 11 points, while for females this ratio increased by approximately 15 points. According to the analysis conducted on individual faculties, it was determined that the highest academic incentive was in the Faculty of Pharmacy in both 2016 and 2017. The lowest average was in the Faculty of Theology in 2016, and in the Faculty of Law in 2017. The ratios of academic staff who earned 30 points and 100 points were examined and it was determined that the ratio of academic staff that earned the maximum 100 points increased while the percentage of academic staff who earned 30 points decreased. These results show that academic incentive plan contributed significantly to the quantitative increase in academic research within one year.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by GCRIS Admin (gcris@artuklu.edu.tr) on 2025-02-15T19:35:19Z No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2025-02-15T19:35:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2019en
dc.description.woscitationindexEmerging Sources Citation Index
dc.identifier.citationcount1
dc.identifier.doi10.2399/yod.18.044
dc.identifier.endpage200en_US
dc.identifier.issn2146-796X
dc.identifier.issn2146-7978
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage189en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid387246
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2399/yod.18.044
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12514/6018
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000481916800006
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherTuba-turkish Acad Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAcademic Incentiveen_US
dc.subjectAcademic Performanceen_US
dc.subjectAcademic Publicationen_US
dc.subjectComparative Analysisen_US
dc.titleHow Was the Academic Incentive Plan Reflected on Performance: Comparative Analysis of 2016 To 2017en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files