How Was the Academic Incentive Plan Reflected on Performance: Comparative Analysis of 2016 To 2017

dc.contributor.author Goksu, Idris
dc.contributor.author Bolat, Yusuf Islam
dc.contributor.other 02.04. Department of Educational Sciences / Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü
dc.contributor.other 02. Faculty of Letters / Edebiyat Fakültesi
dc.contributor.other 01. Mardin Artuklu University / Mardin Artuklu Üniversitesi
dc.date.accessioned 2025-02-15T19:35:19Z
dc.date.available 2025-02-15T19:35:19Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.description Bolat, Yusuf Islam/0000-0002-6120-3157; Goksu, Idris/0000-0002-7120-6562 en_US
dc.description.abstract When evaluating academic performance, research criteria are taken into consideration as well as quality of the instructional delivery. Scientific research is usually carried out by universities. The impact of the academic incentive plan, which was initiated in 2016 in Turkey, can be revealed by comparing the academic incentive results of 2017 with the results of the previous year. The aim of this study is to compare the results of the academic incentive plan for 2016 and 2017 and to examine them in terms of universities, titles, faculties and gender. As a result of this study, 67 academic incentive reports were examined, and it was found that the rate of academic incentives increased by approximately 12 points. Similarly, the average academic incentive score increased by 8.5 points. Associate professor, professor, assistant professor, research assistant and others were ranked as the academic titles receiving the highest amount of incentive, respectively as determined by the analyses performed on the basis of the titles, and it was found out that this order did not change in 2017 either. Our gender analysis revealed that the ratio of academic incentives given to the males increased by approximately 11 points, while for females this ratio increased by approximately 15 points. According to the analysis conducted on individual faculties, it was determined that the highest academic incentive was in the Faculty of Pharmacy in both 2016 and 2017. The lowest average was in the Faculty of Theology in 2016, and in the Faculty of Law in 2017. The ratios of academic staff who earned 30 points and 100 points were examined and it was determined that the ratio of academic staff that earned the maximum 100 points increased while the percentage of academic staff who earned 30 points decreased. These results show that academic incentive plan contributed significantly to the quantitative increase in academic research within one year. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 1
dc.identifier.doi 10.2399/yod.18.044
dc.identifier.issn 2146-796X
dc.identifier.issn 2146-7978
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.18.044
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12514/6018
dc.language.iso tr en_US
dc.publisher Tuba-turkish Acad Sciences en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Academic Incentive en_US
dc.subject Academic Performance en_US
dc.subject Academic Publication en_US
dc.subject Comparative Analysis en_US
dc.title How Was the Academic Incentive Plan Reflected on Performance: Comparative Analysis of 2016 To 2017 en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Bolat, Yusuf Islam/0000-0002-6120-3157
gdc.author.id Goksu, Idris/0000-0002-7120-6562
gdc.author.institutional Göksu, İdris
gdc.author.wosid bolat, yusuf islam/AAU-5517-2020
gdc.author.wosid Goksu, Idris/AAP-7275-2020
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department Artuklu University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Goksu, Idris] Mardin Artuklu Univ, Egitim Bilimleri Bolumu, Edebiyat Fak, Mardin, Turkey; [Bolat, Yusuf Islam] Dicle Univ, Bilgisayar & Ogretim Teknol Egitimi Bolumu, Ziya Gokalp Egitim Fak, Diyarbakir, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.endpage 200 en_US
gdc.description.issue 2 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality N/A
gdc.description.startpage 189 en_US
gdc.description.volume 9 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Emerging Sources Citation Index
gdc.identifier.trdizinid 387246
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000481916800006
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.836
gdc.wos.citedcount 1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 774ca9e9-8596-4132-9a7b-6f8b286ca514
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 774ca9e9-8596-4132-9a7b-6f8b286ca514
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication a790e378-929e-4ae7-87aa-69b5e059d4b6
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 53031234-d01f-45d0-9ce1-acef5d93d46e
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 39ccb12e-5b2b-4b51-b989-14849cf90cae
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery a790e378-929e-4ae7-87aa-69b5e059d4b6

Files