How Was the Academic Incentive Plan Reflected on Performance: Comparative Analysis of 2016 To 2017

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2019

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Tuba-turkish Acad Sciences

Open Access Color

GOLD

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

4

OpenAIRE Views

21

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Average
Popularity
Average

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

When evaluating academic performance, research criteria are taken into consideration as well as quality of the instructional delivery. Scientific research is usually carried out by universities. The impact of the academic incentive plan, which was initiated in 2016 in Turkey, can be revealed by comparing the academic incentive results of 2017 with the results of the previous year. The aim of this study is to compare the results of the academic incentive plan for 2016 and 2017 and to examine them in terms of universities, titles, faculties and gender. As a result of this study, 67 academic incentive reports were examined, and it was found that the rate of academic incentives increased by approximately 12 points. Similarly, the average academic incentive score increased by 8.5 points. Associate professor, professor, assistant professor, research assistant and others were ranked as the academic titles receiving the highest amount of incentive, respectively as determined by the analyses performed on the basis of the titles, and it was found out that this order did not change in 2017 either. Our gender analysis revealed that the ratio of academic incentives given to the males increased by approximately 11 points, while for females this ratio increased by approximately 15 points. According to the analysis conducted on individual faculties, it was determined that the highest academic incentive was in the Faculty of Pharmacy in both 2016 and 2017. The lowest average was in the Faculty of Theology in 2016, and in the Faculty of Law in 2017. The ratios of academic staff who earned 30 points and 100 points were examined and it was determined that the ratio of academic staff that earned the maximum 100 points increased while the percentage of academic staff who earned 30 points decreased. These results show that academic incentive plan contributed significantly to the quantitative increase in academic research within one year.

Description

Bolat, Yusuf Islam/0000-0002-6120-3157; Goksu, Idris/0000-0002-7120-6562

Keywords

Academic Incentive, Academic Performance, Academic Publication, Comparative Analysis, Karşılaştırmalı analiz, Akademik teşvik, Comparative analysis, Academic publication, Akademik performans, Academic incentive, Academic performance, Akademik yayın

Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL

Fields of Science

Citation

WoS Q

Q4

Scopus Q

N/A
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
1

Source

Yuksekogretim Dergisi

Volume

9

Issue

2

Start Page

189

End Page

200
PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 1

Web of Science™ Citations

1

checked on Feb 05, 2026

Page Views

7

checked on Feb 05, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
0.99237239

Sustainable Development Goals

1

NO POVERTY
NO POVERTY Logo

3

GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING Logo

4

QUALITY EDUCATION
QUALITY EDUCATION Logo

5

GENDER EQUALITY
GENDER EQUALITY Logo

7

AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY Logo

8

DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH Logo

10

REDUCED INEQUALITIES
REDUCED INEQUALITIES Logo

11

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES Logo

12

RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION Logo

14

LIFE BELOW WATER
LIFE BELOW WATER Logo