Construction labour, subcontracting and masculinity: “construction is a man’s job”
Loading...

Date
2020
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Construction Management and Economics
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This study examines how construction workers construct their male identity on the basis of their job requirements. A qualitative field research comprising in-depth interviews was conducted with 32 construction workers in Diyarbakır to examine subcontracting in Turkey’s construction sector. The findings show that by defining construction labour in terms of physical capacity, an outcome of the labour conditions shaped by the practice of subcontracting, construction work have become naturalised as a man’s job. The findings also illustrate how construction produces different masculinities that intersect with the understanding of working class shaped by the role of men being the head of the family rather than a single notion of manhood shaped by physical working conditions. Nevertheless, the male worker culture that feeds off different masculinities still retains the power to dominate and exclude women as workers from the construction site, e.g. through means of sexual harassment.
Description
Keywords
Gender, masculinity, subcontracting, Turkish construction, Gender, masculinity, subcontracting, Turkish construction
Fields of Science
0502 economics and business, 05 social sciences, 0211 other engineering and technologies, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
Çınar, S.; Department of Economics, Faculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Mardin Artuklu University, Artuklu/Mardin, Turkey
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
9
Source
Construction Management and Economics
Volume
38
Issue
3
Start Page
275
End Page
290
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 1
Scopus : 13
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 86
Google Scholar™


