Deleuze’ün Anlam Kuramında İfade Oyunu: Tersine Çevirme ve Paradokslar Kurma

Abstract

In this article, which deals with the contribution of the game in expressing the meaning, the ontological aspect and logical dimension of the meaning are examined in terms of Deleuze’s philosophy. Meaning is not the beings pointed out by proposition and words, nor is the result evidenced by cause and effect relationships. Meaning is far from being the belief expressed by the subject. According to Deleuze, meaning is the expressed event. Events are the degrees of motion emanating from objects. To be event makes it non-existent and away from to be pointed out. Since events are in infinitive form, they are indifferent to modes such as positivity-negativity, universalism-particularity, contingency-necessity, and relations such as cause and effect. Approaching propositions with a game of thought allows meaning to be expressed indifferent to modes and relationships. Inverting and forming paradoxes are among the practices of this game for Deleuze. The simulacres that remain outside of thought in Platonism because they do not take part from the models become the subject of the demand for understanding thanks to inversion game. Paradoxes, on the other hand, cause meaning to appear in propositions in a state of indifference. Key Words: Deleuze, Meaning, Expression Game, Inversion, Paradoxes