Deep Learning-Based Artificial Intelligence Can Differentiate Treatment-Resistant and Responsive Depression Cases With High Accuracy

dc.contributor.author Metin, Sinem Zeynep
dc.contributor.author Uyulan, Caglar
dc.contributor.author Farhad, Shams
dc.contributor.author Erguzel, Tuerker Tekin
dc.contributor.author Turk, Omer
dc.contributor.author Metin, Baris
dc.contributor.author Tarhan, Nevzat
dc.date.accessioned 2025-02-15T19:39:26Z
dc.date.accessioned 2025-09-17T14:28:28Z
dc.date.available 2025-02-15T19:39:26Z
dc.date.available 2025-09-17T14:28:28Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.description.abstract Background: Although there are many treatment options available for depression, a large portion of patients with depression are diagnosed with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), which is characterized by an inadequate response to antidepressant treatment. Identifying the TRD population is crucial in terms of saving time and resources in depression treatment. Recently several studies employed various methods on EEG datasets for automatic depression detection or treatment outcome prediction. However, no previous study has used the deep learning (DL) approach and EEG signals for detecting treatment resistance. Method: 77 patients with TRD, 43 patients with non-TRD, and 40 healthy controls were compared using GoogleNet convolutional neural network and DL on EEG data. Additionally, Class Activation Maps (CAMs) acquired from the TRD and non-TRD groups were used to obtain distinctive regions for classification. Results: GoogleNet classified the healthy controls and non-TRD group with 88.43%, the healthy controls and TRD subjects with 89.73%, and the TRD and non-TRD group with 90.05% accuracy. The external validation accuracy for the TRD-non-TRD classification was 73.33%. Finally, the CAM analysis revealed that the TRD group contained dominant features in class detection of deep learning architecture in almost all electrodes. Limitations: Our study is limited by the moderate sample size of clinical groups and the retrospective nature of the study. Conclusion: These findings suggest that EEG-based deep learning can be used to classify treatment resistance in depression and may in the future prove to be a useful tool in psychiatry practice to identify patients who need more vigorous intervention. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 1
dc.identifier.doi 10.1177/15500594241273181
dc.identifier.issn 1550-0594
dc.identifier.issn 2169-5202
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85203512466
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594241273181
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12514/9642
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Sage Publications inc en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Eeg en_US
dc.subject Electroencephalography en_US
dc.subject Depression en_US
dc.subject Treatment-Resistant Depression en_US
dc.subject Deep Learning en_US
dc.subject Convolutional Neural Network en_US
dc.title Deep Learning-Based Artificial Intelligence Can Differentiate Treatment-Resistant and Responsive Depression Cases With High Accuracy en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files