What Is the Role of Religiosity on Political Decision-Making Styles? a Quantitative Study on Adults

dc.contributor.author Dokucu, Dogan Bekir
dc.contributor.author Ayten, Ali
dc.date.accessioned 2024-04-22T11:17:07Z
dc.date.accessioned 2025-09-17T14:28:24Z
dc.date.available 2024-04-22T11:17:07Z
dc.date.available 2025-09-17T14:28:24Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.description.abstract The political decision -making process, which corresponds to an individual's determination of which candidate or party to vote for during elections, emerges from a cognitive process. Voters use various decision -making styles in this political decisionmaking process, and the decision -making styles used by individuals vary depending on several factors. Among these factors, it is believed that one significant aspect influencing individuals' lifestyles, cognitive frameworks, and perspectives is religion and religiosity. The examines the relationship between individuals' political decision -making styles and their religiosity level. In addition, the moderating role of seeing voting as a religious duty in the relationship between religiosity and political decision -making styles is also examined. The study group of the research consists of 310 participants residing in different districts of Istanbul, ranging in age from 25 to 65. A Personal Information Form, Political Decision -Making Scale, and Religiosity Scale are utilized to collect relevant data. The research data was collected face-to-face in November 2021. It is fair to say that the findings obtained have indicated strong relationships between political decision -making styles and religiosity tendencies. As matter of fact, it has been found that as individuals' religiosity tendencies increased, their tendencies towards that enabled faster and easier political decision -making styles. Individuals with higher levels of religiosity also tend to exhibit a preference for rapid and straightforward, cognitive shortcut -based, partisan, and intuitive decision -making styles. Analyses of the relationship between religiosity and analytical decision -making style revealed a positive association, indicating that a tendency towards the knowledge -worship dimension increased the inclination towards analytical decision -making style. In line with the data the study has yielded, the parameter of considering voting as a religious duty modarate religiosity and analytical decision -making. More clearly, it has been determined that seeing voting as a religious duty increases the effect of religiosity on analytical decision -making. en_US
dc.identifier.citation Dökücü, Doğan Bekir - Ayten, Ali. “Politik Kararlar Almada Dindarlığın Etkisi Nedir? Yetişkinler Üzerine Nicel Bir Araştırma”. Eskiyeni 52 (Mart 2024), 31-49. https://doi.org/10.37697/eskiyeni.1412293. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.37697/eskiyeni.1412293
dc.identifier.issn 1306-6218
dc.identifier.issn 2636-8536
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.37697/eskiyeni.1412293
dc.identifier.uri https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/en/yayin/detay/1229780/politik-kararlar-almada-dindarligin-etkisi-nedir-yetiskinler-uzerine-nicel-bir-arastirma
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12514/9579
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Anadolu Ilahiyat Akademisi en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Eskiyeni en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Psychology of Religion en_US
dc.subject Voting Behavior en_US
dc.subject Voter Behavior en_US
dc.subject Political Decision-Making en_US
dc.subject Cognitive Heuristics en_US
dc.subject Religiosity en_US
dc.subject Dimensions Of Religiosity en_US
dc.title What Is the Role of Religiosity on Political Decision-Making Styles? a Quantitative Study on Adults en_US
dc.title What is the Role of Religiosity on Political Decision-Making Styles? A Quantitative Study on Adults
dc.title.alternative What is the Role of Religiosity on Political Decision-Making Styles? A Quantitative Study on Adults en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.wosid Dokucu, Dogan'Bekir/Lkk-4407-2024
gdc.author.wosid Ayten, Ali/Aab-4458-2021
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department Artuklu University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Dokucu, Dogan Bekir] Mardin Artuklu Univ, Islami Ilimler Fak, Din Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dali, Mardin, Turkiye; [Ayten, Ali] Marmara Univ, Ilahiyat Fak, Din Psikolojisi Anabilim Dali, Istanbul, Turkiye en_US
gdc.description.endpage 49 en_US
gdc.description.issue 52 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality N/A
gdc.description.startpage 31 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Emerging Sources Citation Index
gdc.description.wosquality N/A
gdc.identifier.openalex W4393139157
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:001197276400005
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type TR-Dizin
gdc.oaire.accesstype GOLD
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 1.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.5414617E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.keywords Din Psikolojisi
gdc.oaire.keywords seçmen davranışı
gdc.oaire.keywords din psikolojisi
gdc.oaire.keywords voting behavior
gdc.oaire.keywords Philosophy. Psychology. Religion
gdc.oaire.keywords oy verme davranışı
gdc.oaire.keywords dindarlık boyutları
gdc.oaire.keywords Psychology of Religion;Voting Behavior;Voter Behavior;Political Decision-Making;Cognitive Heuristics;Religiosity;Dimensions of Religiosity
gdc.oaire.keywords religiosity
gdc.oaire.keywords Psychology of Religion
gdc.oaire.keywords political decision-making
gdc.oaire.keywords cognitive heuristics
gdc.oaire.keywords politik karar verme
gdc.oaire.keywords bilişsel kısayol
gdc.oaire.keywords psychology of religion
gdc.oaire.keywords Din Psikolojisi;Oy Verme Davranışı;Seçmen Davranışı;Politik Karar Verme;Bilişsel Kısayol;Dindarlık;Dindarlık Boyutları
gdc.oaire.keywords voter behavior
gdc.oaire.keywords B
gdc.oaire.keywords dindarlık
gdc.oaire.keywords dimensions of religiosity
gdc.oaire.popularity 3.1294674E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 13.05539443
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.93
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 10%
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.wos.citedcount 0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 39ccb12e-5b2b-4b51-b989-14849cf90cae
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 39ccb12e-5b2b-4b51-b989-14849cf90cae

Files