Air Quality Forecasting Using Machine Learning: Comparative Analysis and Ensemble Strategies for Enhanced Prediction
Loading...

Date
2025
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer Int Publ Ag
Open Access Color
HYBRID
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Air pollution poses a critical challenge to environmental sustainability, public health, and urban planning. Accurate air quality prediction is essential for devising effective management strategies and early warning systems. This study utilized a dataset comprising hourly measurements of pollutants such as PM2.5, NOx, CO, and benzene, sourced from five metal oxide sensors and a certified analyzer in a polluted urban area, totaling 9,357 records collected over one year (March 2004-February 2005) from the Kaggle Air Quality Data Set. A comprehensive comparison of ten machine learning regression models XGBoost, LightGBM, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, CatBoost, Support Vector Regression (SVR) with Bayesian Optimization, Decision Tree, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Elastic Net, and Bayesian Ridge was conducted. Model performance was enhanced through Bayesian optimization and randomized cross-validation, with stacking employed to leverage the strengths of base models. Experimental results showed that hyperparameter optimization and ensemble strategies significantly improved accuracy, with the SVR model optimized via Bayesian optimization achieving the highest performance: an R2 score of 99.94%, MAE of 0.0120, and MSE of 0.0005. These findings underscore the methodology's efficacy in precisely capturing the spatial and temporal dynamics of air pollution.
Description
Keywords
Air Quality Prediction, Machine Learning, Bayesian Optimization, Regression Models, Svr, Machine Learning, Regression Models, SVR, Bayesian Optimization, Air Quality Prediction
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q3

OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Source
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
Volume
236
Issue
7
Start Page
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 13
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 75
SCOPUS™ Citations
14
checked on Feb 25, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
12
checked on Feb 25, 2026
Page Views
6
checked on Feb 25, 2026
Google Scholar™


