Comparison of the Transobturator Tape and Minisling Methods in the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence

dc.contributor.author Sagir, Suleyman
dc.contributor.author Basgut, Ozlem
dc.contributor.author Tuncekin, Adem
dc.contributor.author Ergun, Muslum
dc.contributor.author Turgut, Omer
dc.date.accessioned 2025-09-15T16:31:38Z
dc.date.available 2025-09-15T16:31:38Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.description.abstract Background: This study aims to evaluate and compare the transobturator tape and minisling surgical techniques in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence, focusing on their effectiveness and postoperative outcomes. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 113 patients who underwent midurethral sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence at Islahiye State Hospital between January 2016 and October 2022. The patients were divided into two groups: Those treated with transobturator tape (Group 1, n = 70) and those treated with minisling (Group 2, n = 43). Data were collected from medical records and follow-up interviews. The variables assessed included demographics (age and body mass index), preoperative and postoperative Urinary Incontinence Quality of Life Scale scores, and postoperative pain details. Operative details, such as procedure duration and hospital stay length, were recorded. Patients were also asked about postoperative symptoms, including groin pain and dyspareunia. Additionally, the duration of symptom-free months following surgery was documented. Binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of surgical methods on long-term well-being. Results: The transobturator tape and minisling techniques demonstrated similar improvements in postoperative Urinary Incontinence Quality of Life Scale scores (p = 0.213). However, the minisling procedure had significantly shorter operative time (29.2 min vs. 52.2 min, p <0.001) and hospital stay (1.33 days vs. 1.96 days, p = 0.003) than transobturator tape. Postoperative complications were notably higher in the transobturator tape group, with significantly more patients reporting groin pain (28.6% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.002) and dyspareunia (20.0% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.002). Logistic regression analysis identified surgical method as the primary predictor of long-term well-being beyond one year (p = 0.040). Conclusions: While the transobturator tape and minisling surgeries are effective for treating stress urinary incontinence, the minisling method offers advantages, such as shorter operative time, reduced hospital stay, and fewer postoperative complications, over the transobturator tape method. These findings suggest that the minisling approach may provide a more favorable patient experience, particularly due to reduced postoperative pain and quick recovery, than the transobturator tape method. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257806.91
dc.identifier.issn 0004-0614
dc.identifier.issn 1576-8260
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-105013252991
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257806.91
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12514/9319
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Iniestares, S.A. en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Archivos Españoles de Urología en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Urinary Incontinence en_US
dc.subject Midurethral Slings en_US
dc.subject Transobturator Tape en_US
dc.subject Dyspareunia en_US
dc.title Comparison of the Transobturator Tape and Minisling Methods in the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.scopusid 57290407800
gdc.author.scopusid 57222670818
gdc.author.scopusid 59339106600
gdc.author.scopusid 56531630200
gdc.author.scopusid 57221967569
gdc.author.wosid Tunçekin, Adem/Hch-8358-2022
gdc.author.wosid Sagir, Suleyman/Iam-8192-2023
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department Artuklu University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Sagir, Suleyman] Mardin Artuklu Univ, Fac Med, Urol Dept, TR-47000 Mardin, Turkiye; [Basgut, Ozlem] Gaziantep Univ, Fac Med, Urol Dept, TR-27000 Gaziantep, Turkiye; [Tuncekin, Adem] Usak Univ, Fac Med, Urol Dept, TR-64000 Usak, Turkiye; [Ergun, Muslum] Istanbul Atlas Univ, Fac Med, Urol Dept, TR-34000 Istanbul, Turkiye; [Turgut, Omer] Fatih Gebze State Hosp, Urol Dept, TR-41001 Kocaeli, Turkiye en_US
gdc.description.endpage 683 en_US
gdc.description.issue 6 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q3
gdc.description.startpage 677 en_US
gdc.description.volume 78 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
gdc.description.wosquality Q4
gdc.identifier.openalex W4412886486
gdc.identifier.pmid 40776866
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:001609105900001
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.index.type PubMed
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 0.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.4895952E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.popularity 2.7494755E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.0
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.39
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.plumx.mendeley 2
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 0
gdc.scopus.citedcount 0
gdc.virtual.author Sağır, Süleyman
gdc.wos.citedcount 0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication c9134177-e6b4-49f5-b988-bffb4e620b29
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery c9134177-e6b4-49f5-b988-bffb4e620b29
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 699b05f8-13b6-432a-a67f-7cf80b49367a
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 3f27f943-1869-4252-af6a-9ec8b114c727
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 39ccb12e-5b2b-4b51-b989-14849cf90cae
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 699b05f8-13b6-432a-a67f-7cf80b49367a

Files