Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Plane Block and External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Two-Center Randomized Controlled Trial

dc.contributor.author Kacar, Cem Kivilcim
dc.contributor.author Dedeoglu, Andac
dc.contributor.author Tosun Soner, Hulya
dc.contributor.author Celik, Enes
dc.contributor.author Andic, Okan
dc.contributor.author Acil, Fatma
dc.contributor.author Gokcek, Erhan
dc.date.accessioned 2025-11-15T15:16:16Z
dc.date.available 2025-11-15T15:16:16Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.description.abstract Background and Objectives: Although various regional anesthesia techniques are commonly used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), to date, no randomized controlled trial has compared the effectiveness of Quadratus Lumborum Plane Block (QLB) and External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block (EOIPB) in LC. Our aim was to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided QLB and EOIPB in providing postoperative analgesia after LC. Materials and Methods: In this two-center, randomized controlled trial, patients undergoing LC were divided into QLB and EOIPB groups. Our primary outcome was the postoperative pain scores measured using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at predetermined intervals. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale (RSAS) score, and patient satisfaction. Results: The NRS pain scores at postoperative 30th minute, 4th, 12th, and 24th hours were significantly lower in the QLB group (p < 0.05). Patients in the QLB group required significantly less tramadol compared to the EOIPB group (p < 0.000). The QLB group also demonstrated lower RSAS scores (p = 0.005), indicating a smoother recovery process. Patient satisfaction scores were markedly higher in the QLB group (p < 0.000). Although both blocks were well-tolerated with no differences in side effects, EOIPB was associated with higher opioid consumption, indicating its relatively limited effectiveness. Conclusions: To conclude, this study highlights that QLB is a more effective option for postoperative analgesia and improves patient satisfaction after LC. EOIPB may serve as a viable alternative for some patients; however, given the advantages of QLB in pain control and recovery, it stands out as a more preferable method. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/medicina61101838
dc.identifier.issn 1010-660X
dc.identifier.issn 1648-9144
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-105020029974
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61101838
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12514/9936
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher MDPI en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Medicina-Lithuania en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy en_US
dc.subject Quadratus Lumborum Plane Block en_US
dc.subject External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block en_US
dc.subject Postoperative Analgesia en_US
dc.subject Opioid Consumption en_US
dc.title Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Plane Block and External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Two-Center Randomized Controlled Trial en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Kaçar, Cem Kıvılcım/0000-0002-0015-948X
gdc.author.id çelik, enes/0000-0002-5546-4924
gdc.author.id Uzundere, Osman/0000-0002-5968-4561
gdc.author.id gökçek, erhan/0000-0002-4945-9328
gdc.author.scopusid 37861668100
gdc.author.scopusid 58560649000
gdc.author.scopusid 58764011300
gdc.author.scopusid 58643638400
gdc.author.scopusid 57214725291
gdc.author.scopusid 58666872400
gdc.author.scopusid 57034138900
gdc.author.scopusid 57191609537
gdc.author.wosid Akelma, Hakan/A-2146-2019
gdc.author.wosid Kaçar, Cem/Aar-2524-2020
gdc.author.wosid Uzundere, Osman/Abc-7711-2020
gdc.author.wosid Acil, Fatma/Jyp-9393-2024
gdc.author.wosid Tosunsoner, Hulya/Odj-7636-2025
gdc.author.wosid Çelik, Enes/Izp-6671-2023
gdc.author.wosid Gökçek, Erhan/Adb-3891-2022
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department Artuklu University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Kacar, Cem Kivilcim; Dedeoglu, Andac; Tosun Soner, Hulya; Andic, Okan; Acil, Fatma; Uzundere, Osman; Gokcek, Erhan] TR HSU Diyarbakir Gazi Yasargil TRH, Dept Anesthesiol & Reanimat, TR-21070 Diyarbakir, Turkiye; [Celik, Enes; Akelma, Hakan] Mardin Artuklu Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Reanimat, TR-47200 Mardin, Turkiye en_US
gdc.description.issue 10 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q1
gdc.description.volume 61 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
gdc.description.wosquality Q1
gdc.identifier.openalex W4415156252
gdc.identifier.pmid 41155827
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:001603821200001
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.index.type PubMed
gdc.oaire.accesstype GOLD
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 0.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.4895952E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen true
gdc.oaire.keywords Article
gdc.oaire.popularity 2.7494755E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.0
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.57
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 10%
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.plumx.mendeley 2
gdc.plumx.newscount 1
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 0
gdc.scopus.citedcount 0
gdc.wos.citedcount 0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 39ccb12e-5b2b-4b51-b989-14849cf90cae
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 39ccb12e-5b2b-4b51-b989-14849cf90cae

Files