Effects of Cooking Mahi-Mahi (coryphaena Hippurus) Fish Fillets With Different Techniques on Their Phospholipid and Triacylglycerol Fatty Acid Composition
Loading...

Date
2024
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Consejo Superior investigaciones Cientificas-csic
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
In this study, the fatty acid (FA) composition in phospholipid (PL) and triacylglycerol (TAG) fractions of mahi-mahi fish fillets cooked with different methods was investigated. Compared to the triacylglycerol fraction, 16:0, 18:0, 20:4 omega 6, 20:5 omega 3, 22:5 omega 3, 22:6 omega 3, Sigma SFA and Sigma omega-3 PUFA were found to be higher in the phospholipid fraction. However, 18:1 omega 9, 18:2 omega 6 and Sigma omega-6 PUFA were found to be low. The omega-3/omega-6 ratio in the phospholipid fraction of mahi-mahi fillets, both raw and cooked using different methods (frying with sunflower oil, frying with olive oil, frying with corn oil, frying with hazelnut oil, oven, grill, microwave and steamed), was found to be significantly higher than triacylglycerol. 22:6 omega 3, & sum;PUFA and & sum;omega-3PUFA levels were higher in the phospholipid fraction of oven-cooked fillets compared to the control fillets. In the triacylglycerol fraction, the omega-3/omega-6 value, one of the important nutritional parameters, was found to be higher in the microwave-cooked fillets than in oven-cooked, grilled or steamed fillets.
Description
Keywords
Cooking Methods, Fatty Acid, Mahi-Mahi, Phospholipid, Triacylglycerol, Vegetable Oils, Omega-3/Omega-6, Phospholipid, Nutrition. Foods and food supply, Cooking methods, Mahi-mahi, TX341-641, Vegetable oils, Fatty acid, Triacylglycerol, Métodos de cocción, ω-3/ω-6, Triacilgliceroles, Fosfolípidos, Aceites vegetales, Ácidos grasos
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Q4
Scopus Q
Q4

OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Source
Grasas y Aceites
Volume
75
Issue
3
Start Page
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 0
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 2
Google Scholar™


