İcmâ teorisi ve bâkıllânî’nin etkisi
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2014
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Abstract
Bu makalede, ilk dönem usûlcülerinden Bâkıllânî’nin icmâ anlayışı, kendisinden önceki iki usûlcü Şafiî ve Cessâs ile sonraki iki usûlcü Cüveynî ve Gazzâlî’nin görüşleri de dikkate alınarak incelen- miştir. Böylece Bâkıllânî’nin görüşleri ile birlikte ilk dönemlerde icmâın gelişimi bir nebze ortaya konulmaya çalışılmıştır. Hanefî usûlcü Cessâs’tan sonra kelamcı usûlcü olarak ilk defa icmâı geniş bir şekilde ele alan Bâkıllânî, aynı zamanda icmâı ilk tanımlayan usûlcüllerden biri olmuştur. Daha sonra icmâın gerçekleşmesinin imkânını tartışmış ve bunun mümkün olduğunu, ilk dönemlerde bunun sabit olduğunu ve icmâın imkânını ve sübutunu reddedenlerin iddialarının geçersizliğini ifade etmiştir. İcmâın hücciyyetinin delillerinin akli değil, naklî olacağını söylemiş ve bu bağlamda Kur’an’dan bazı ayetleri ve bazı hadislerin ortak manasını delil olarak aktarmıştır. Ayrıca icmâın gerçekleşmesinin şartlarını, geçerli olduğu alanları ve diğer bir takım fer’î meseleleri incelemiştir.
In this article, the idjma theory of Baqillani, one of the methodists from the early period, is examined by taking into account considering his views in relation to the views of his two prede- cessors: Methodists Shafici and Cassas and his two successors: Methodist Cuwayni and Ghazzali. By doing that, the development of idjma in its formative period has been presented. After Cassas who is a Hanefi methodist Baqillani is the first mutakallim methodist dealing with idjma in great length and defining it. He also discusses the possibility of the ralisation of idjma and argued it was possible. He said it was constant at the begining and expressed that the arguments of those who deny the posibilities and establishment were not valid. He said that the evidences forthe validity of Idjma are not rational but sciriptural. In this context, he prove his case by gathering some verses from Quran which share the same meaning with hadiths. Additionally, he analysed the conditions of occurence of the Idjma, the areas where it is valid and some other secondary cases related to that issue.
In this article, the idjma theory of Baqillani, one of the methodists from the early period, is examined by taking into account considering his views in relation to the views of his two prede- cessors: Methodists Shafici and Cassas and his two successors: Methodist Cuwayni and Ghazzali. By doing that, the development of idjma in its formative period has been presented. After Cassas who is a Hanefi methodist Baqillani is the first mutakallim methodist dealing with idjma in great length and defining it. He also discusses the possibility of the ralisation of idjma and argued it was possible. He said it was constant at the begining and expressed that the arguments of those who deny the posibilities and establishment were not valid. He said that the evidences forthe validity of Idjma are not rational but sciriptural. In this context, he prove his case by gathering some verses from Quran which share the same meaning with hadiths. Additionally, he analysed the conditions of occurence of the Idjma, the areas where it is valid and some other secondary cases related to that issue.
Description
Keywords
Din Bilimi
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q
Source
Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi
Volume
16
Issue
30
Start Page
17
End Page
53